Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)PA
Posts
15
Comments
191
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I don't think the issue is corps feeding the internet into AI systems. The real issue is gatekeeping to information and only giving access to this information while milking the individual for data by trackers, money by subscriptions, and more money by ads (that we pay for with subscriptions).

    Another larger issue that I fear is often ignored is the amount of control large corporations and in theory the government can have over us just by looking at our trace we leave in the internet. Just have a look at Russia and China for real world examples of this.

    • verwirrte Geräusche Eitorf auf Lemmy zu lesen -

    Das sind halt auch Gehfaule Menschen. Wo sollen die denn dann sonst einkaufen, wenn sie keinen Parkplatz finden?

    Hennef? 15 Minuten Siegburg? 20 Minuten Windeck? Ha ha Eines der vielen Buchhölzer?

    /s

    Die Leute hatten leider noch nie eine Auto-freie Stadt. Bologna's Innenstadt ist so schön am Wochenende. Gepaart mit einem halbstündigen Linienverkehr wie an Kirmestagen wäre das doch eine feine Sache.

  • Dasselbe gilt für Bewegung und Zeit für Freunde oder andere Aktivitäten.

    Also zu viel Bewegung und Freunde auch nicht gut? 😬 Muss ich falsch verstehen.

    Ich denke aber, man sollte bei der Bildschirmzeit differenzieren können. Ich hatte/habe genug Freunde, die trotz 5 Stunden oder mehr pro Tag Bildschirmzeit feste und tiefe Freundschaften entwickelt haben, eben online. Das war unsere Alternative zur lokalen Dorfjugend, die den ganzen Tag gebolzt, geraucht und gesoffen hat. Von den anderen schlechten und politisch-rechten Umgangsformen mal abgesehen.

    Online (viel Online) != zwangsweise Schlecht.

    Den ganzen Tag Candy Crush zocken oder Insta scrollen... weiß auch nicht ob das so gut ist. Ja, in solchen Fällen stimme ich dir zu. Da muss man gegensteuern. Mit einem einfachen Verbot macht man es sich allerdings zu einfach.

  • Exhausting is a good description. I don't mind people seeing me from time to time when i feel like it. But man I am so much more tired when having the camera on after and during a meeting.

  • Yes, I totally agree with what you said.

    They currently try to buy out the digital gaming space of the internet, sell it for cheap and later on up the price. That's what big corporations usually do nowadays. Same with X, Google, Amazon, Netflix, etc. It's a big issues that we as consumers and later on citizens of our planet face.

    However, currently it is a sweet deal for me. And the argument that I'd own the game otherwise doesn't count for me as I would most probably never replay it. So what's the use of owning it if it's just collecting dust in the shelf?

    The argument of whose property the item is is different for me for movies, series, and audiobooks. I'm surprised that this scheme was not yet applied for books / e-books. Or am I wrong?

  • I can totally relate. Paying 30-100€ per game is something for rich people or something I'd do once or max twice a year on very carefully selected games, hoping these games are worth it. With Game Pass I spend 120€ a year to access a wide range of games.

    Once I played through or once version 2 of a game comes out, I'm not likely to play it ever again.

    Also I have phases where I play a lot and phases where I do not play at all. I can simply discontinue Game Pass in these cases.