Ok comrade, lets go get em 
(that's me giving you the gun, best emoji idea I had)
Cracker is of course the functional specification for the associated cultural characteristics, but it can apply to any fitting person from any white western country. This is why the maoist dictionary specifies that slur for the Amerikkkans are limited to the set referring to the geographical area+cracker pehnotype and culture.
I saw the headline this morning. Thought for a split second "I wonder which unit the Guardian considers high profile? I bet it's not Azov because they'd just name that..." Then I realized a split second later that they absolutely would hide the name in the story to avoid immediate associations without having all the "context" about Azov's "not a nazi group anymore" around it.
I opened the article, Azov was the first word I saw. Then I closed it in dosgust. Now you posted the text and I feel like I could've guessed every sentence without reading it lol
Damn, I was mostly being sarcastic about its confuingsness (because there's a bunch of lies being spread) but this is an excellent explanation and it did fill some big gaps in my knowledge (I must have missed the news that Machado was gonna get Edmundo as president?). Very sensible take, though, which makes fills all the holes in the bullshit that BBC and Guardian wrote.
This news is so confusing. I have no idea what's happening with Guai-dos and her arrest/protest/coup/hostage situation
You still believe in the speed of light?
Definitely the best idea I've ever heard for a unique take on alien life. There is a huge, awesome book to be written about interactions with this species and I won't be writing it. But I hope someone does
I thought the title was a reference to Hawk Utah and was trying to pronounce it that way to figure out wtf it was saying. It's just Dark MAGA is a weird (childish?) accent
I would say that's true if not for the stuff around it, because it's accusing Netanyahu of "getting us into endless wars" right around this quote, and it's generally a negative claim about Netanyahu the whole time. Trump also wants to destroy all enemies of the Zionist entity, but he wants Netanyahu groveling at his feet to do it. This video makes it seem like Netanyahu just gets his way. And trump doesn't like it when others get their way lol
Trump shares a video of Sachs where he talks shit about Netanyahu. Netanyahu will come groveling and Trump will give in and help with genocide. It's a tragic and horrific spectacle. The kayfabe is impressive.
unhoused people who have been pushed into LA and shoved around until they had nowhere and no options?
For sure, my question is basically was the original movement really liberatory/historically progressive or something like a petit bourgeois liberal uprising?
Holy shit how close is this to like the center? I know it's mostly suburban hell, but that looks like it's getting close to burning down skyscrapers too. That's some dangerous looking fire. And I imagine the large unhoused population is in major fear with few options...
Anyone listen to the RevLeft episode on Syria? I'm very curious about the position that the 2011-2012 period was a possibly real and meaningful revolution. The speaker said that after this period, it was coopted by the west. But what that period in Syria looked like seems interesting. Any good resources on that specific period?
Yep, working in a safety critical environment and constantly hear how safety reports will be made by personally tailored AI and requirements developed and managed with AI. Then the natural step is to hire AI consultants to do that. Fuckin hell it's looking bleak. And because every business executive thinks this is the solution, it'll become a race to the bottom because all capital will also go to those dumbass ideas, then all people capable of doing work without AI will be replaced by those who do it less well with AI over time. I'm entirely unconvinced that this will be good (despite the fact historically that such advances have been fine, like with calculators or computers generally). This time we don't KNOW how the solution is reached..
Very good! Seems to be heavily based off of the release of archival evidence of the last 20-30 years and worth while. Little completely "new" evidence for people with lots of background knowledge, but lovely little bits of writing from random people. I'm a bit confused in how its organized tbh, because I feel like it doesn't stick well enough to a strict timeline, but to be fair, I'm listening while working out and not having my full attention on it, so could be on me.
I have not done ANY looking at sources and such, so I'm not yet 100% believing stuff I'd never read or anything though.
I was also trying to imagine in what situation this was possible and what notation it could possibly be
Wtf is this lol. Is this what American culture is? It's actually kinda cute for once
As one tracks one's own calories, and tracks and keep consistent one's activities, it can turn it from estimated to a hard science. That's what I mean. Just that CICO CAN be super accurate, more accurate than most biology we can do in simple "uncertainty" terms. But my overall point is that this is not effective at tackling desires/problems around weight at any larger scale than the "individual in trackable conditions". My only disagreement is linguistic here, I think, and partially a separation of levels of complexity.
I mean that CICO is very precise when isolated, but not precise with variation in a person or groups lives. And CICO is not useful in most of the cases, despite being perfectly scientific at the less complex-scale.
