Kissaki @ Kissaki @beehaw.org

帖子

33

评论

476

加入于

1 yr. ago

Mainly working on a game-jam game with a friend.

It's been very interesting and quite fun. We're using Godot. Progress is going well, despite our lack of previous experience.

Why does there have to be money in it when they're sunsetting the service?

That sentence is clearly in reference to the one right before it. It's an elaboration of consequence of the one before.

Should I tell my friend to not think about punching their aggressor’s face? Should I deny them their small coping mechanism?

Their tone is not at all like you make it out to be.

Community rules should deny locked-away content.

Some other communities have a "have it accessible, if not on the link, provide an unlocked alternative link too".

Enough post content can also allow discussion. But locked away linked content certainly doesn't.

I think it's still a net-positive.

After that author's post (from 2020) Microsoft acknowledged and apologized the bad way they went about it. (IIRC anyway.)

It's certainly a shitty situation for the author, with the PM opportunity at Microsoft not working out (reason unknown/not visible to us). The author can't invest as MS can into their project. The author could continue, but obviously, it's less "useful" now as a product, with a "better" alternative.

Having it be a Microsoft-maintained project gave and gives it a lot more impact and significance, both functionality-wise and public-/enterprise-wise. Having an official package manager like this is a very good thing.

And the author on the post you linked says as much in their post. They're not upset about anything else other than the communication in regards to the hiring process he was not that interested in anyway. That's not really "stealing". Just superseding. With an aside shitty-communication.

Can you source your claim, that Azure hypervisor uses CrowdStrike? Because a Microsoft spokesperson told Ars that that issue was unrelated to the CrowdStrike update.

[…] cited as "a backend cluster management workflow [that] deployed a configuration change causing backend access to be blocked between a subset of Azure Storage clusters and compute resources in the Central US region."

A spokesperson for Microsoft told Ars in a statement Friday that the CrowdStrike update was not related to its July 18 Azure outage. “That issue has fully recovered,” the statement read.

Microsoft services were, in a seemingly terrible coincidence, also down overnight Thursday into Friday. […]

A spokesperson for Microsoft told Ars in a statement Friday that the CrowdStrike update was not related to its July 18 Azure outage. "That issue has fully recovered," the statement read.

from https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/07/major-outages-at-crowdstrike-microsoft-leave-the-world-with-bsods-and-confusion/

They were not "using it". And there's no "stragglers still".

No no.

Have you tried turning it off and on and off and on and off and on and off and on and off and on and off and on and off and on and off and on and off and on and off and on and off and on and off and on and off and on and off and on and off and on again?

They could drop all the tracking though and only serve the public redirects. A much simpler product that would retain web links.

Maybe one of the participants was named Al.

Notepad++, local files

as of 2021, Valve employed just 79 people for Steam, which is one of the most influential gaming storefronts on the planet.

There's value in stability, but some things have long been stagnant and could be improved. It took a long time for the client and website to get some significant changes.

I don't know if I would prefer more changes. I certainly would like and want some. But that could inevitably lead to undesirable changes too.

When I applied for a job there over a decade ago [to improve some stuff myself] I didn't receive an answer.

researchers scanned a dead fish while it was “shown a series of photographs depicting human individuals in social situations. The salmon was asked to determine what emotion the individual in the photo must have been experiencing.”

The work is, however, a compelling and humorous demonstration of the problem of multiple comparisons. This is a principle in statistics that basically says when you’re looking at enough bits of information (i.e. doing lots of statistical tests), some will seem to be what you’re looking for – purely by chance. In fMRI experiments, there are a LOT of pieces of data to compare, and without statistical correction for this phenomenon (which is not always done), some will indeed be significant, just by chance.

Around 30% of people with depression have what’s known as treatment-resistant depression, meaning multiple kinds of medication or therapy have failed to improve their symptoms. And for up to two-thirds of people with depression, treatment fails to fully reverse their symptoms to healthy levels.

Depressingly big numbers

Disappear sounds like they vanished into nothing. Does and did that happen? Or did they cease to operate, presumably with some closing handling?

They're also very open and transparent. Work, guidelines, workflows, etc.

It's a shining example of an alternative kind of company, and it's insightful and a great resource of information.

For Windows, what made you decide on Chocolatey rather than winget/Windows Package Manager?

Yeah, no

Schachner says she is certain he was pleasuring himself while they had a conversation she thought was going to be about her career.

In a parade of clips, boldfaced names like Janeane Garofalo, Roseanne Barr, Dave Chappelle and others either defend Louis C.K. or blame the women who came forward or both. Clips of fans walking into one of his shows echo that attitude with a simple, dismissive notion: Everybody makes mistakes.

Meanwhile, the film depicts women who helped expose his misconduct as mostly still struggling, watching as more powerful comics friendly to Louis C.K. minimize their work and what he did to them.

[The documentary] Sorry/Not Sorry asks viewers to consider all this again – as pop culture’s short memory threatens to erode progress made by the #MeToo movement – insisting that the stories of those hurt by misconduct remain a central part of the conversation.