As a counter point Jesus would have also said "What on earth is a 'government program'?"
Erm.. it preaches being "slaves for Christ", with very few safeguards on what are good boundaries for leaders to have over you. I agree on the ideals, but the power dynamics also "treat people terribly"
While I agree with your sentiment, the problem with the Bible is that it doesn't contain democracy. It only really has examples of god ordained despots. So one can "follow the Bible" and have results that are wack.
Israel was supposed to still be loyal to King David even though he was a liar, murderer and adulterer. Jesus has the opportunity to tell people to reject Caesar but instead choose to more or less tell them to let Caesar be Caesar and keep whatever is God's separate. It was tacit acknowledgment that sometimes you have to obey evil rulers. (St Paul carries this on in Romans)
So obviously that was necessary in first century Judea. The problem is that's the only scenario the new testament deals with.
Add to that that all Jesus' ethics are person based, without a single word of what a government should or shouldn't do. Minus all the common sense tradition amalgamated in Europe over 1600 years, and you have the religious right of America.
That part of the Old Testament still applies somehow because reasons.
That's because Romans 1 also says gay sex is bad
Humans are apes. It's monkeys we're not descended from.
You're right, I wouldn't. But you must realise trolley dilemmas are shit for exactly this reason. It exposes the fact that, at the end of the day, yes, we will prioritise our own children over someone else's. What people don't seem to acknowledge is that this is the choice presented to Israel. People act like the choice is "kill children or don't kill children" as if it's that black and white and crude. When it's really "kill Hamas now with collateral damage or wait for the next time they deliberately target women, children, babies". They're the actual two tracks to choose between. I don't blame Israel for killing Hamas wherever they find them and not accepting their cowardly attempt to use their relatives as shields.
Since I was quite young at the millennium, but old enough to totally remember it, they'll come a day (hopefully) when I'm one of the few very old people in the world who "remembers the 20th century". Like how there were a small number of people kicking around in the 1980s who could remember the 1800's..
Dosbox
Am seriously considering founding a not-for-profit to provide an ad free / spam free / bot free basic community. Would cost a dollar or two a month. Chief differences to the lemmy would be one account per person via proof of identity signup (I think this would improve behaviour and discourage spam), a single authority to tackle voting abuse and other things useful to be not federated.
Aside from that revenue would cover technical staff costs + hosting and the rest could go to some good cause. There's be no ads. No data selling. Not conflict of interest over how the platform evolves. Would be open source. Adults only.
Id keep it as basic as possible to try and capture the spirit of 90s fora. Am not even sure I'd allow inline images or vid.
Thoughts?
Should be a filter on tinder
Would I bomb a proven terrorist who is known to be plotting the deaths of more children even if he's surrounded by his family? Yes, unfortunately.
This isn't a "who likes killing children" competition. It's a really shitty trolley dilemma where inaction means letting killers continue to plot their next campaign targeting women and children
If leaving them alone meant you didn't know if their next target was your kids school, or your wife's place of work, or your parents retirement village, would you press the button on them or not?
And how are Hamas commanders allegedly in a land cleared by the IDF and in a “safe zone” the IDF told civilians to move to?
I refer you to every guerrilla war ever.
While I agree with what you say, you must realise it's not in Hamas' interest to advertise to people around them exactly who they are? They rely on people not fleeing. Some are family members, yes. But others? They probably have no idea a senior commander is two tents over from them.
Of all of them my experience is that younger gen x / older millennial are the most hands-on technically literate. Grew up in 80s 90s as home computers became main stream but required a good deal of tinkering. They currently form the body of 40-50 year old electrical engineers, senior devs and consultants. Not really in game development (where crazy hours are a young man's game), rather IT and business as a whole.
How it is. It's not unusual to come across replies that on the surface are passable but are ever so slightly...off. And the comment history is the same. People who make it their business to undercover bot networks regularly find groups of accounts that post automated chat-gpt type responses and seem to act in unison. Their methods vary but sometimes they all post the same low effort zero depth reaction comments as a strategy to build up karma without being spotted. The fact the platform is structured for popularity and engagement in such a way that this is worth doing (and polluting any regular discussion in the process) is entirely what's wrong with Reddit.
Type of thing that would be found. This particular investigation sub now private but there are others
How is "lol if you're using a developer resource expect to need to follow basic technical instruction" boomer energy?
The accusations comes from them wanting to use a small tool for specific nefarious purpose (tracking people across social media). That's what "script kiddie" generally means: younger people lacking technical expertise seeking to use the "hacking" tools that others have made.
The more I see of Gen Z the more I feel secure in my IT job. There's no new generation of home grown tech nerds coming to push us out. Half of these guys think hacking is hitting view-source on a webpage or (hushed whispers) finding the developer tools menu...
I seem to be completely failing to work out how to do this? See the reply in your inbox in the context of the original conversation?