I think this is a good example of how societal norms impact science.

This has the same vibes as gamestop starting an nft marketplace.

Honestly when it works it works wonderfully. Most of my problems with my ender 3 come down to me being a dumbass and not taking care of it properly, and/or just the nozzles they ship with it being cheap as fuck and impossible to cold pull.

No joke my first ever successful cold pull was 2 days ago, because I had finally gotten a decent set of nozzles.

If you want to get really serious about printing there are better options out there, but for the cost they really are awesome beginner printers (to be fair I haven't kept up much with printers, so I don't know many other good cheap ones). I mostly only dabble with printing, but my ender 3 pro that I got like 3 years ago has served me very well.

They're still around and they still make cards. The onboard audio in my PC broke, so I bought an Audigy FX and it's served me ever since.

Idk why but censoring R*ddit is way funnier than it should be

Just like a shark, a mole is smooth in all directions.

Harry Potter, though it just doesn't focus on any of the poo people

Edit: completely misread isn't as is

Don't give her my name

It's fake. I recall a while back someone said they had a dream that candy crush had a meta community now and they made this image as an example.

I think it's fine in its original contexts (i.e. "retardant", or to "retard" something), but could maybe be avoided in 80% of cases.

It is inexcusable to apply it to people though.

Honestly if there are Russian agents at play it's probably these people trying to further drive a wedge between leftists and moderates. I've seen plenty of threads where even the most moderate criticism of Biden is dismissed as vocal support for Trump and trying to spread voter apathy.

The thing that actually spreads apathy is this behavior. Yes, you should vote for Biden because harm reduction is always better than nothing. But you shouldn't have to be happy about it.

Doesn't really seem like a brag so much as a tongue-in-cheek way of dismissing it. "Yeah, we kill animals. But.... the food is good?"

Though I certainly see what you mean.

I don't get why this is specific to millennials.

So just like European settlers they took all the resources and gave the natives bee smallpox.

I'm talking more so about HDDs, which were still very prevalent back then. SDDs wouldn't hit similar size to price for a few more years.

I had a mid-range laptop back then that was at least 500+ gigs with a HDD. And when I got my desktop, which was a hand-me-down 2012 dell inspiron from my grandmother, it had a 2TB HDD.

These days SSDs are fast and cheap, so the 1TB standard not really changing a ton has more to do with the switch from HDDs to SSDs.

I could be misremembering a few things here, so feel free to correct me.

Multi-core CPUs were still starting out to be fair, but they were definitely at least somewhat mainstream by the time of the 360/ps3. The 360 was tri-core, and was considered easier to develop for since all three of those cores shared resources. Meanwhile, the cell architecture is hard to develop for even by modern standards. As such, most games only made use of the PPE and left the SPE alone.

On the one hand I think it's kinda just the natural progression of things. The reason we haven't been feeling the need for huge storage is because hard drives underwent a huge boom that rapidly outpaced our memory needs. Like even 10 years ago, 1TB was pretty much the standard, and kinda still is. We also used to have optical disks that most of the game data would just live on.

On the other hand, there is no reason for a remake of a PS2 game to take up 70 gigs.

Gives me hope for a proton drive app. As soon as that's available and viable I'll be able to drop my mega subscription.

What these people don't realize is you're never gonna get AGI by just feeding a machine an infinite amount of raw data.

Fontawesome and its consequences have been a disaster for web development.