I saw a video of Charlie Kirk quoting Gramsci's prison notes the other day to call someone a cultural fascist.
The comments were all jerking him off for being so incredibly smart and well read.
Kind of a self-report on the coherence of our side when CHUDs admit that theory written is spot on when they want to read that theory...but reverse-engineer it because they think cultural institutions have made too many concessions and want to make them more nakedly bourgeoisie again.
What right-wing theory can we possibly hope to appropriate? Gentile? Evola? The only thing a fascist can offer is aesthetics. They're not an ideology, they're a lifestyle brand.
National Fascist Party used a black flag, Mussolini had a fleeting interest in syndicalism, the National Socialist German Workers Party used a red flag, the nazis initially did actually appeal to workers, at one point the stasserite faction had a 100,000 members or so.
NeoNazis do an absolutely shit job of appealing to actual workers, take some comfort in that.
anyway, we get starship troopers /s
The ratio of people who quote Gramsci vs the people who have read Gramsi is so fucking skewed. It's hard to think of a Marxist author who has been more co-opted and bastardized tbh. (Though you could make a compelling case that Paolo Freire is a contender for this given what happens in universities, especially education and social work departments.)
Don't get me wrong, I think Gramsci's pretty great but if you're quoting Gramsci at me imma be watching carefully to see whether you're doing that to impress people or if you're actually just a Gramsci aficionado.
pedagogy of the oppressed is what, 200 pages? how do you not read that
YouTube comments make me lose my faith in humanity. I have watched couple of “Charlie Kirk owns the libs” clips and my first thought is always, “well that was a dumb gotcha moment, he owned the person because the person was just not prepared for such a weird comeback, I bet the comments call him out on that”. Nope, I am wrong 100% of the time.
There's a reason it's almost exclusively right wing "media" (I'm including social media in this) types who want to debate college kids, people on the street, etc. Their politics crumble when faced with someone who's had basically any time whatsoever to prepare.
Wait, what?! When the fuck did conservatives discover the phrase, "social fascist"? This is our phrase we use on succdems!
Can you even call it a movement when it's the default paradigm?
It's like calling yourself a pro-breathing activist.
im glad the chasers have found something new
quick, wear more diapers. i'm sure the kids will think climate change isn't real then
Critical support to TPUSA for destroying conservatism
Greg Doucette is the only conservative whom I respect, and even he agrees that the conservative media in general are worthless.
I saw a video of Charlie Kirk quoting Gramsci's prison notes the other day to call someone a cultural fascist.
The comments were all jerking him off for being so incredibly smart and well read.
Kind of a self-report on the coherence of our side when CHUDs admit that theory written is spot on when they want to read that theory...but reverse-engineer it because they think cultural institutions have made too many concessions and want to make them more nakedly bourgeoisie again.
What right-wing theory can we possibly hope to appropriate? Gentile? Evola? The only thing a fascist can offer is aesthetics. They're not an ideology, they're a lifestyle brand.
National Fascist Party used a black flag, Mussolini had a fleeting interest in syndicalism, the National Socialist German Workers Party used a red flag, the nazis initially did actually appeal to workers, at one point the stasserite faction had a 100,000 members or so.
NeoNazis do an absolutely shit job of appealing to actual workers, take some comfort in that.
anyway, we get starship troopers /s
The ratio of people who quote Gramsci vs the people who have read Gramsi is so fucking skewed. It's hard to think of a Marxist author who has been more co-opted and bastardized tbh. (Though you could make a compelling case that Paolo Freire is a contender for this given what happens in universities, especially education and social work departments.)
Don't get me wrong, I think Gramsci's pretty great but if you're quoting Gramsci at me imma be watching carefully to see whether you're doing that to impress people or if you're actually just a Gramsci aficionado.
pedagogy of the oppressed is what, 200 pages? how do you not read that
YouTube comments make me lose my faith in humanity. I have watched couple of “Charlie Kirk owns the libs” clips and my first thought is always, “well that was a dumb gotcha moment, he owned the person because the person was just not prepared for such a weird comeback, I bet the comments call him out on that”. Nope, I am wrong 100% of the time.
There's a reason it's almost exclusively right wing "media" (I'm including social media in this) types who want to debate college kids, people on the street, etc. Their politics crumble when faced with someone who's had basically any time whatsoever to prepare.
Wait, what?! When the fuck did conservatives discover the phrase, "social fascist"? This is our phrase we use on succdems!