Its quicker in the US because of the voltage difference. In the UK kettles are quicker.
Big benefit to a kettle is not heating the container in the same way, making it easier to pour/brew. Also no timing involved as the kettle turns itself off once the water has boiled (whatever the volume) where as in the microwave you have to get the time right for whatever your bpiling.
Kettle is also great for boiling water for cooking - you can put freshly boiled water into a pot and then get it up to boiling or simmer on the hob fast.
also some of them have temperature control. it's awesome. I can set it from 40 to 100 degree with 5 degree intervals. also it has option to keep the water warm up to an hour
Also electric kettles are basically free nowadays. I got a lovely glass one because less stuff builds up in it and it’s fun to watch it go from “ “ to “gruarghblrarblrarbl” like *damn this tea gonna be stellar”
My old trusty just died in multiple ways, the top broke (the plastic "handle" to open it broke) , the poutruding thingy fell off and it doesn't stop when the water boils, all in a couple of months.
Gotta get a new one, any great ones I should consider? I live in France and there are not a lot of different ones to choose from.
Kettles are more efficient and thus faster at a given wattage.
The only reason a microwave would be faster is if you have low-wattage kettle or a 220v microwave, in which case it isn't an apples to apples comparison
Thank you. Between our lower outlet voltage and my strong aversion to taking up unnecessary kitchen real estate, I've never seen value in an electric kettle.
Now to get back to the British/American animosity, I rarely drink tea. I use my kettle to heat water for coffee in the French press.
I do enjoy a good herbal in the winter months, but something like Earl Gray is a rare occasion for me.
i don't have a microwave, but isn't there a chance water can "overheat" in the microwave and instantly, explosively vaporise when you put something in? is this just super rare, so nobody cares?
I think the scenario would require you to heat up pure H20 in a perfectly clean non porous glass. The H20 would not bubble and boil so the temperature would raise above the boiling point.
Once anything is introduced, like a spoon or a tea bag, into the liquid it would explode with steam and super hot water.
I'm sure someone smarter than me could explain it more better.
the water and the container would need to be very clean and the container would need to be very smooth and free of surface defects for that to happen. even microscopic cracks or scratches in glazing or glass can act as a highly effective starting point for boiling.
think scraping over the bottom of a glass with a spoon: that might be enough already to create those kinds of scratches.
FYI, the reason that microwaved water is an offence to tea drinkers isn't actually the microwave part.
The issue is that black tea should be made using water over 95°C (203F). Basically a rolling boil, straight out of the kettle. With a microwave, your water likely hits 100, then cools quite rapidly. By the time you add it to the tea, it's getting too cold.
The optimal temperature is different for green or white teas, but Britain mostly drinks black tea.
On a side note, a disproportionate number of British "explorers" wrote complaints about not being able to make a good cup of tea, while climbing mountains. The power air pressure lets water boil at lower temperatures.
The only difference, thermodynamically, is the volume of water. Water of the same volume, in the same container, heated to 100c will cool at the same rate regardless of the heating method. So, your brewing temperature, while important, isn't a difference at all unless you're brewing your black tea directly in the kettle, and I'm not a Brit, but I don't think that's how it's done.
Doesn't latent heat change the time taken to cool? Also part of the point of a kettle being that it's 100c wheras a microwave could easily be under since it turns off based on time.
The kettle is a lot closer to the cup and has thermal mass. I generally pour with the water at the bottom still boiling slightly. It takes time to get the water out of a microwave and pour it into the pot/cup.
A kettle gets the water to a boil, then stops. A microwave is likely to either overheat (and so waste energy) or under heat, and so be too cold.
The kettle water can be used to easily warm the pot, if needed, before it fully boils.
Kettles are a lot more consistent for water heating than microwaves. Add water, click switch, wait for boil and switch clicking off. I would give good odds I could walk into most people's kitchens and work their kettle without instruction or significant effort.
American beer is the tits, and I'm sick of the rest of the world judging us by the piss water that gets exported. Sweetwater, voodoo ranger, wiseacre, lagunitas, yoozoo, I could go on and on. American beer has evolved into something magical over the past couple decades.
But microwaves taint the flavor of the water. So fuck that. Ekettles only for me. Too bad they are not as fast here in the US. UK voltage is double ours.