Do you really think that underneath a headline saying "Spanish tourist gang-raped in India", that you need to warn the reader that the news article includes content about rape?
Are there people who would open it thinking "Ach it's probably a misprint, I bet she just ended up dancing through flowery meadows and cuddling fluffy bunnies the whole holiday"?
I'm not blaming the poor woman, I'm asking what the husband did. They say she travelled with her husband and that she was raped in the tent she was sleeping in. They never follow up on the husband. Was he in the tent and did nothing, or was he somewhere else.
Put in another way, why the hell didn't the husband intervene.