Super simple
Super simple
17 comments
-
-
-
-
Is the bottom the gamma function? It looks similar to this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function#cite_ref-27
-
idk I don't speak huge fuckin nerd
-
-
Why you got 6 pairs of glasses on then poindexter?
-
-
Yes, it is proof of Stirling's formula through Euler-Maclaurin formula.
-
-
I LOVE ANALYTIC CONTINUATION I LOVE ANALYTIC CONTINUATION -
Draw the rest of the fucking owl.
-
The proof is left as an exercise for the reader.
-
The proof of the intermediate step is left as an exercise to the reader.
-
I love it when a book explicitly tells you a step is "obvious", almost as if to call you an idiot for not seeing it.
-
-
Somebody missed out on doing some simple, bog standard population dynamics.
You have r(t) rabbits, where r= ...
17 comments
if it makes you feel any better, i have a math degree and i still find stats hard to think about. shit's kinda wild and the way it's taught is usually subpar. you're doing well to get through it at any pace.
Doing math without notation is even worse.
I have to do calculus and shit for my stats lectures and its a nightmare. I can never understand the first time and then I have to spend ages afterwards looking up what the hell the equations and letters mean