We did do this in 2018.
86 3 ReplyI smile every time I read this story.
19 0 ReplyGod that website is disgusting on mobile. There is ads just popping in and out of existence causing the site to just bounce up and down make it near impossible to read
15 0 ReplyFirefox + uBlock Origin. Just read it and there were no popups for me.
16 0 Replylooks alright with an ad blocker
5 0 ReplyJust for you with your lack of an ad blocker
5 1 Reply
Yeah, U.S. should have definitely invaded a sovereign nation we had no defensive treaties with in order to pick a direct fight with a nuclear power.
Yeah the response sucked, but it was a very different Ukraine at the time. The worry is now that funding has to keep coming for the war.
72 13 ReplyWell, no, you see, there were no Russian troops in Crimea at the time, so there would have just been unaffiliated peacekeepers with American accents in the area cleaning those bandits up! No fight with a nuclear power needed!
60 4 ReplyBombing Russia would be fucking hilarious though
20 1 Reply..is hilarious the word for escalating a hot war between nuclear powers?
8 3 Reply
It's a joke tho
7 3 Reply
Wait, I thought this community was supposed to be non-credible?
46 2 ReplyIt's so credible it becomes noncredible. It's noncredible that it didn't happen.
61 3 ReplyAh, that makes just the wrong amount of sense. Carry on!
22 0 ReplyIt's all politics rolled into one! A singularity of credibility!!
11 0 Reply
This is the equivalent of America winning an argument in the shower the day after lol.
18 1 Replyactual events during battle of khasham (aka conoco fields) (2018), worked out pretty well
10 0 Reply7 0 ReplyWTF even is this sub? Are you children?
5 24 Reply