Gazans to IDF: Hamas steals URNWA food, kills civilians who ask for aid

A publication can be credible and also still be extremely biased. If a right wing publication publishes a story " black people say affirmative action is unfair" the story may be factually correct in that they found a couple black people that said it's bad and quoted them but at its core it's just a "people are saying" story. Like any "people are saying" story who these people are?, how many of them are their?, do they represent or have power over the people the article is implying they do? Etc. is conveniently left out.

the fact that they chose the story shows bias as well. If the only justification for calling a story news is the fact it fits your worldview than the publication is biased. The publication is responsible for reporting on stories that are relevant and effect a large amount of people. This story does not as it's just some anecdotes reported to the IDF. If this was a large scale issue reported by independent aid organizations or shown through polling on the ground than that would be a story as it's actually effecting a large amount of people.

This is war, and that changes the trustworthiness and bias when reporting. Here's a study from 2004-2008 that deals specifically with conflict reporting and bias.

"The Jerusalem Post, clearly a partisan outlet, favored the Israeli side of the conflict..."

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331532871_Partisanship_and_Bias_in_the_Israeli-Palestinian_Conflict_A_Comparative_Study_of_Four_International_Media_Outlets

Also, lol at conveniently moving right past the context of my comment and the inherent problems with trusting the domestic media of a country waging war and their coverage on the morality and alleged bad actions of the oppositional forces.

Mediabiasfactcheck is biased in its own right. People are dismissing Jpost because it's ridiculously biased towards the Israeli right wing.