Supreme Court...

Text from post:

So lemme get this straight.

Lorie Smith, owner of 303 Creative, doesn't actually design websites. Her company doesn't actually provide that service.
Stewart (last name withheld) didn't ask for a wedding site for him and his husband from her.
Stewart isn't gay. He's married to a woman and they have a kid together.
AND what could possibly be the most ironic occupation for Stewart to have? He's a web designer.

You can't make this shit up. Or I guess you can. Because Lorie and the Supreme Court did.

5 comments

That's just the result of the inability to challenge laws unless you're personally affected.

In Germany we have something called abstrakte Normen-Kontrolle, which does exactly what it sounds it does: Federal or state governments or a quarter of members of parliament can ask the Consitutional Court to review a law in the abstract and decide wether it's compatible with the constitution.

This saves a lot of headaches when it comes to laws that are on the books but unenforced, or are new and so far unchallenged.
So they made their decision based on a fucking lie ? What the hell is that.
- That's US "democracy" Bought and paid for, wholesale.
What is this referring to?
- Driving me crazy that I didn't find an answer so while this is old, this is the first article that popped up when I searched "Lorie Smith Court"