Terrible parenting. If you're going to go to the trouble of yeeting your baby at least do it properly with a baby trebuchet.
30 1 ReplySeriously, you could yeet it at least 300m that way, maybe more since they're less than 90kg.
5 0 Reply
Missing rung on lower end causes baby to slip out prior to launch half the time. Launch distance is subpar compared to other yeet machines.
I know it was made for Victorian babies but mine is Edwardian. One out of five stars, would not recommend.
26 0 ReplyWell, the stars are saying this is the right way. And they can't be wrong.
1 0 Reply
On the other side of the room
15 0 ReplyThis is just an old-school rocker / bouncer, no? It looks like it’s meant to “float” the child like a one-sided sea-saw?
I guess if you pulled it all the way down and released, it could slightly yeet the child, but there are absolutely better contraptions if going for distance
8 0 ReplyYeah it is, it's just funny with the caption
8 1 Reply
Throws out all of the baby, and none of the bathwater. Saves hundreds on water bills!
7 0 ReplyBratapult
7 0 ReplyWoudn't having a spring under it be more efficient than a weird bent strap? I can't imagine it would launch the baby too far.
7 1 ReplyWeird bent strap is called a "leaf spring."
17 0 ReplyAh, thanks for the knowledge! Is it stronger than a twisty spring?
4 0 Reply
They didn't have such advanced spring technology back then.
It's still inferior to the medieval baby trebuchet.
14 0 ReplyYeah but the baby trebuchet is how we got all this stork nonsense, we can’t go back to random babies dropping from the clouds.
8 0 Reply
Brand new sentence!
4 2 Reply