Switch 2 vs Steam Deck: the Cyberpunk 2077 face-off
Switch 2 vs Steam Deck: the Cyberpunk 2077 face-off

Switch 2 vs Steam Deck: the Cyberpunk 2077 face-off

Switch 2 vs Steam Deck: the Cyberpunk 2077 face-off
Switch 2 vs Steam Deck: the Cyberpunk 2077 face-off
For someone owning both devices and actually trying to decide which version to get, both are decent in portable mode with the Switch 2 taking the lead in docked mode (as the Deck doesn't increase its power limits in docked mode whatsoever). So I'd probably get the Switch 2 version if I didn't have a desktop PC to go with my Deck, but I do, so my "docked" experience (playing on my PC) is vastly superior anyway, with the Deck getting the portable part done.
For a technical comparison it's kind of inaccurate I think. Yes, it's certainly impressive that the Switch 2 can run this game in portable mode likely consuming less than 10 watts for the entire system while producing okay graphics. And it's clear that DLSS does a lot of heavy lifting here, but:
I still think the Switch 2 is very impressive in terms of performance in portable mode, certainly more than I expected when hearing about the rumored Ampere architecture and the Samsung manufacturing process.
It also shows that something comparable to DLSS (likely FSR 4) would be hugely beneficial to PC handhelds so I hope that the Deck 2 will properly support that. Sad that AMDs Z2 series don't, but I hope Valve is cooking another custom chip with AMD soon.
You might want to look into sunshine and moonlight for streaming from your PC to the steamdeck. It means your deck will only sip battery, fans will be whisper quite, and the graphics will be stellar, all for a tiny amount of latency.
Does anyone notice much difference between 25 fps and 30 fps at these screen sizes?
I don't have one these handhelds, but in general, I've found that smaller screens make lower frame rates feel a lot less choppy.
Why would a smaller screen make framerate not matter? Textures and resolution, sure, but framerate always matters.
The difference being 25 v. 30 is the murky side of DF here.
The game runs at 40fps on Switch2 in handheld and in docked with a 120hz display. DF chose to lock it to a 60hz display so the game would lock back to 30.
It's disingenuous.
on steam at the moment, Cyberpunk is 20.99.
Switch 2 version is 69.99
👋thanks for trying nintendo.
If you know where to look, a certain athletic woman can give it to you for free if you're on a Steam Deck!
Wii fit trainer?
Or you could reward CDPR for maintaining support and releasing a wonderful DLC for it with a purchase on a platform that lets you own your games (and is incidentally owned by CDPR too)
Do you know how to use said athletic woman's installers on the Steam Deck, or Linux in general?
I don't know where to look. Please help
Or for me it would make CP2077 and hundreds of other games free to play on the Steam deck (since I already own them)
You can buy it on a cartridge for Switch and later resell it.
I don’t miss selling my two month old games for five dollars at GameStop.
Nintendo aren't the ones who set the price
At least e.g. steam can't arbitrarily choose to brick your colputer
Does Nintendo let you play content that you accidentally downloaded from the high seas? And do you need to worry about Nintendo killing your account for doing such a thing?
no, they don't. but the game has been out for 5 years at this point.
articles like these seem quite pointless to anyone who doesn't already own a switch 2. and possibly pointless even to people who own a switch 2, but have already played cyberpunk on better or similar hardware.
this article is an attempt to pat a multi billion dollar company on the back so it doesn't feel as bad that people aren't racing out to buy their 5-year-late, overpriced attempts to dominate the handheld market again.
Well, at least for the physical edition, they have to account for the cost of the 64 GB game card they are using. Wasn't that rumored to cost like $16 a piece?