Psa: the reason Microsoft makes these tools linux friendly is because the know thats where the developers are at and they want them to stay familiar with their tools.
It also lowers the amount of fuss developers make when work forced them to use powershell etc because at least they can remote control and script from linux.
As long as they are free and open source, I don't care.
Well, it's made by Microsoft so I would stay away from it, even if it's FOSS, it's still entitled to enshitification, so...
sees that it's made with Rust
I'll probably use it on a daily basis!
You may try this:
firejail --net=none microsoftedit somecode.idk
I don't like M$, but this is my new number one recommendation for new programmers. It gets them to stay within the command line, while having the normal shortcuts they're used to from using a computer already.
I love Vim, but it's a chore to learn when you're also learning programming on top. Emacs is even worse, it tricks you by being a non-modal GUI, but your keyboard shortcuts all do something new and slightly insane now.
Although micro already exists for this.
Does Micro have normal keyboard shortcuts instead of the weird ones from nano ?
... Surprised it took them this long to get a tui editor in Windows. I would have assumed they had at least something somewhere.
Psa: the reason Microsoft makes these tools linux friendly is because the know thats where the developers are at and they want them to stay familiar with their tools.
It also lowers the amount of fuss developers make when work forced them to use powershell etc because at least they can remote control and script from linux.
As long as they are free and open source, I don't care.