1mo ago

Australian reporter covering Los Angeles immigration protests hit by rubber bullet on live TV

www.cbsnews.com

Since I keep having to remove the video posts, here's an actual article on it:

A Boring Dystopia @lemmy.world

return2ozma @lemmy.world

1mo ago

Australian reporter covering Los Angeles immigration protests hit by rubber bullet on live TV

www.cbsnews.com /news/reporter-los-angeles-protests-rubber-bullet-lauren-tomasi-9news-australia/

News @lemmy.world

jordanlund @lemmy.world

1mo ago

Australian reporter covering Los Angeles immigration protests hit by rubber bullet on live TV

www.cbsnews.com /news/reporter-los-angeles-protests-rubber-bullet-lauren-tomasi-9news-australia/

26 comments

Australian reporter covering Los Angeles immigration protests ~~hit by~~ intentionally shot with rubber bullet on live TV
Dude clearly aimed and shot at with intention
https://lemmy.world/post/31090916
- I'm going to be honest, I would not be the least bit surprised if media outlets were intentionally toning down the coverage and framing it this way as an attempt to avoid getting into Trump's crosshairs.
  And yeah, watch the video. He intentionally raised his gun and shot her in an attempt to scare her away from continuing to cover it.
  
  media outlets were intentionally toning down the coverage
  American media, or media in general, toning down police brutality? Whaaaaaaaaaaat? Noooooooooooo. They would never do such a thing.
- You can clearly see him deliberately lining up the shot, aiming at the reporter from fairly close range.
Pro-tip - If you can't tell who the reporters are, maybe try NOT shooting at people holding microphones and talking into cameras? 🤔
Unless the goal is press intimidation... but then when is it not?
- Unless the goal is press intimidation…
  DING DING DING.
She OBVIOUSLY Deserved it! She was being VIOLENT!
-Conservatives who Do Their Own Research!
- She spoke in weird tongues, and the american HERO was intimidated by these unfamiliar nosises that were NOT AMERICAN. A true hero.
I dont understand how an article interpreting the post for you is better than a video that shows plain as day what happened? In the past, I've tried to post information before its become widely known, and doesn't have any news articles written on it yet, and its been removed for "not being news". This is completely antithetical to the point of this sub in my opinion.
- Simple, videos are unvetted, from unknown sources, and can contain jankey spammish monetization.
  Rather than go item by item and saying "this video is OK, this one isn't" we have an established rule of "no videos".
  
  Yeah, I dont buy that argument. Not my sub tho, so 🤷🏻
- In an attempt to answer your question, there tends to be a lot of misinformation following events like this. Often footage doesn't even need to be AI or altered, it can just be footage from other events that looks similar that's posted in good faith by people trying to spread the news. I assure you some of the clips flying around at the moment are from the George Floyd protests, or even a sports hooligan riot, or from events that didn't even occur in this country.
  At least in theory (and theory is doing a lot of heavy lifting with my attempt at answering your question), a news publication has an obligation to in some way determine the veracity of what they're publishing.
  
  I mean, I watched live footage of the protests on Saturday night. This isn't something that even happened weeks ago, and they're taking down stuff that shows a direct source. It just gives more leeway to the media to determine what is and isn't okay to show the public. I get the point their trying to make. But it seems really one sided to just make a blanket ban on videos.
Leave it to an Aussie to shrug it off, too "I'm good. I'm good."
- Surprised she didn't go after him! LOL!
  
  Serious!
- "At least the fucking bullet wasn't venemous!"
Fucking downgraded censored video.
For good quality original one go there :
https://lemmy.world/post/31090916
(thanks to @distantsounds )
- "Original"... except at least the video in this article doesn't have vertical video syndrome where the sides are cropped out. The quality is definitely lacking though.
- How is it censored? The one you linked to also has the audio bleeped out and, since it's been converted to vertical format, it is clearly not the original.
  This one is a better quality horizontal format, but even it has the audio censored. I've yet to see an actual uncensored one.
The camera guy was like see ya! .....runs.....then "are you okay". Honestly I would do the same though.
I can't confirm this yet, so no link to post, but I'm being told ICE in Vancouver, WA just took a couple who were dropping off their kid at school.

26 comments