Colorado’s governor vetoes landmark ban on rent-setting algorithms
Colorado’s governor vetoes landmark ban on rent-setting algorithms
Colorado's governor vetoes landmark ban on rent-setting algorithms
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/30522666
There's a reason why Democrats are losing support left and right in the while country.
They're simply Republican light.
CO resident here:
Polis didn't veto the bill because he wanted to have rent raised in Colorado, or make collusion legal and anti-trust illegal, he vetoed the bill because what it was making illegal is already illegal here. Passing this new law would have done nothing except increase the number of laws on the books. Over the last few years Polis has made it a priority to remove superfluous laws from the books.
If this is causing Democrats to lose support, it's not because of the policy, it's because of the headline-only-reactions and refusal of so many voters to actually think about what it is they're presented with
So a law already exists, but it clearly isn't being enforced, so they passed a new one with teeth. But this DINO wants the old, weak law to supercede the new, useful law, and the corp that it was meant to stop congratulates him.
When people say both sides are the same, this is what they mean.
And when Polis vetoed a act that would have removed a superfluous block on unionization, did that also help make the law all smooth and happy?
Yup, if it doesn't make people upset they don't share it and ads don't get viewed.
To summarize your comment.
Do you think we can fix "headline only reactions" amongst voters, or do you think we should do things that make good headlines regardless of if it increases the number of laws, a metric absolutely nobody cares about?
It's almost as if voters are human and we should care about what they think, rather than expect every voter to think like you do.