Minnesota Supreme Court: Female breasts are not lewd or inherently sexual and can be exposed in public
Minnesota Supreme Court: Female breasts are not lewd or inherently sexual and can be exposed in public
This really needs to be normalized. Men can use desensitization to staring at boobs.
Plus if its hot and you need relief, let the puppies breathe.
Been to topless beaches, naked boobs honestly are less attractive to the eye then boobs in a bikini top.
Sexual clothing ends up being like 80% of the reason my eye is drawn to tits most of the time.
Fun fact: they once dressed up some female rats in 'slutty' clothes and make up and the male rats preferred that to other female rats that were 'au naturel'. You'd think a species with no concept of a nudity taboo wouldn't notice this, but apparently that happened.
Point is: accentuated or 'decorated' nudity would be sexier than just simple nudity.
What does this mean?
They're referring to a study regarding learned associations with sexual arousal:
https://www.livescience.com/48980-rats-sexual-attraction-lingerie.html
The boys' first sexual experience was with a girl in a vest, so they sought more of what they knew they enjoyed. It's not that certain clothing is inherently sexual, but that the sex/clothing association is learned.
Which makes me what made those male rats gravitate towards the female rats in makeup and a microskirt thingie...
What I mean is that the study contrived the situation such that their first time having sex would be with a female in a vest. This caused the rats to associate the vests with sexual pleasure and form an association between clothing and sex. Similar studies have trained rats to associate other things with sex as well.
I wonder if desensitization really works here. I'm kind of annoyed that boobs have this power over me. And in this day and age it's not hard to see them every day.
I see naked boobs all the time.
Still love naked boobs.
I'm definitely down to try and find out.