This isn't a case of a streamer talking to a viewer through chat. This is a case of an adult private messaging with a minor in a self admittedly "inappropriate" manner. Doc might have said after the fact that he didn't "intend" on following through with his messages, but when an adult, even jokingly, is making plans to meet up with a fan at a convention who is a minor, that's a BIG red flag.

Twitch had no choice but to ban him. What if they did nothing and he did end up meeting up with them? What if it turned into SA allegations and it was found out that Twitch was aware of this? I don't know about you, but I wouldn't want my kids talking to an adult over private messages full stop. Let alone if the content was "inappropriate".

If you're a 40 y/o texting "inappropriate" things to a minor, you should have your twitch contract cancelled too.

Cats purrcking

Mets aren't good enough? ::cries in Yankees:::

Thanks! This was something that drives me crazy, but it seems like the biggest offenders are repost bots (which I don't have any problem with in general) and I suspect they are going to miss this post.

Interesting statistics on this (mind you, this is all from quick Google searches because I was curious). Data centers use about 90 billion kWh of power a year globally (which seems to include servers, cooling, and all the misc energy usage) while AC use is about 250 billion kWh per year globally.

Of that 90 billion kWh a year, I have no clue how much of it is used on AI (and how much AI is going to increase that number in the future) but it seems like, today at least, AC usage puts a lot more stress on the power grid than data centers do.

You also have to account for how that power is used. Data centers will use a pretty consistent amount all year long where AC usage spikes when needed hitting the grid with huge loads all at once.

The tl;dr of that article isn't even "no". It provides both sides of the accounts and references academics that argue both ways.

I read it to make the same argument you did, but ended up considering it a surprisingly well written article.

Dancesafe.org was it! I'm going back over 20 years to the late 90's early 2000's. I can't comment on the state of ecstasy today, I haven't rolled in over 20 years.

Worse than that, that one website dance something that would test pills found that a huge percentage of the "ecstasy" people took didn't contain MDMA. A surprising amount didn't even contain illegal drugs. Just over the counter speed.

Pretty much the same thing for watermelon. It was an easy to grow fruit that freed slaves used as a source of income and they caricatured it in racist media.

Love it or hate it, they aren't intentionally designed not to be walkable, they're intentionally designed to discourage traffic from driving through them.

The reason communities like yours and the one behind your house aren't connected is to reduce the amount of cars driving down your block. To make it safer for your kids to play outside.

It's a very Italian American thing. It's not really something you'd see in Italy.

Wine didn't exist until Jesus got tired of water and wanted to catch a buzz.

OP is the user they banned. That's what the commenter is talking about.

What's funny is you think you're being edgy and sarcastic, but you just stumbled into the right answer.

When it comes to martial arts, skill does though. That's why I got my ass handed to me by a 16 y/o girl who is much smaller than me.

Just because you have a IPv6 address doesn't mean you're actually using it. At best you're tunnelling IPv4 traffic through your carrier's IPv6 network. Current estimates (from Cloudflare) show only about 34% of the global internet uses IPv6.

If you only used IPv6, you wouldn't be able to access nearly 66% of the internet.

Same boat. My partner's grandfather had a bunch of WW2 memorabilia that their parents passed down to us. Among it are the papers of some Nazis he took off their bodies as well as other odds and ends.

It just sits in a box in our closet. It's interesting history, but definitely not something I have any interest in displaying.

There's two interesting things the article points out.

1. These were recontact polls. So these were people who were already polled, presumably a small percentage changing their minds.
2. These were multiple pills across different organizations running them. So while they can be within the margin of error, they all saw the same trend.

Obviously you can't go by polls, and there's a ton of time between now and Nov, but it's interesting nonetheless.

Private landlords would just sell to large corporate landlords who could profit with smaller margins.