Alibaba Releases Advanced Open Video Model, Immediately Becomes AI Porn Machine
It took about 24 hours for Alibaba’s Wan 2.1 to become popular in the AI porn community.
The year is 1997. A young boy is about to watch a porn video for the first time on a grainy VHS tape. An older version of himself from the far off year of 2025 appears.
Me: "You know, in the future, you'll make your own porn videos."
90s me: "Wow, you mean I'll get to have lots of hot sex!?!?"
Me: "Ha! No. So Nvidia will release this system called CUDA..."
I thought this was going to go Watchmen for a moment. Like...
It is 1997, I am a young boy, I am jerking off to a grainy porno playing over stolen cinemax.
It is 2007, i am in my dorm, i am jerking off to a forum thread full of hi-res porno.
It is 2027, i am jerking off to an ai porno stream that mutates to my desires in real time. I am about to nut so hard that it shatters my perception of time.
Then another company called Deepseek will release a system called low level programming that replaces CUDA.
It's super funny to me that they named it "WanX" haha
Kudos to the English speaking guy on the team who pushed that under the radar. That has got to be intentional.
it fulfilled its name mandate %100
mind-blowing
Hmm, it's certainly blowing something.
I am going to make this statement openly on the Internet. Feel free to make AI generated porn of me as long as it involves adults. Nobody is going to believe that a video of me getting railed by a pink wolf furry is real. Everyone knows I'm not that lucky.
Fortunately, most of my family is so tech illiterate that even if a real video got out, I could just tell them it's a deepfake and they'd probably believe me.
Does the wolf need to be an adult in human years or dog years?
Yeah after certain point this shit doesn't really do anything... But younger people and mentally vulnerable people gonna be rocked by this tech lol
I'd like to point out the program is named WanX...wanx....wanks.....
First off, I am sex positive, pro porn, pro sex work, and don't believe sex work should be shameful, and that there is nothing wrong about buying intimacy from a willing seller.
That said. The current state of the industry and the conditions for many professionals raises serious ethical issues. Coercion being the biggest issue.
I am torn about AI porn. On one hand it can produce porn without suffering, on the other hand it might be trained on other peoples work and take peoples jobs.
I think another major point to consider going forward is if it is problematic if people can generate all sorts of illegal stuff. If it is AI generated it is a victimless crime, so should it be illegal? I personally feel uncomfortable with the thought of several things being legal, but I can't logically argue for it being illegal without a victim.
I think another major point to consider going forward is if it is problematic if people can generate all sorts of illegal stuff. If it is AI generated it is a victimless crime, so should it be illegal? I personally feel uncomfortable with the thought of several things being legal, but I can't logically argue for it being illegal without a victim.
I've been thinking about this recently too, and I have similar feelings.
I'm just gonna come out and say it without beating around the bush: what is the law's position on AI-generated child porn?
More importantly, what should it be?
It goes without saying that the training data absolutely should not contain CP, for reasons that should be obvious to anybody. But what if it wasn't?
If we're basing the law on pragmatism rather than emotional reaction, I guess it comes down to whether creating this material would embolden paedophiles and lead to more predatory behaviour (i.e. increasing demand), or whether it would satisfy their desires enough to cause a substantial drop in predatory behaviour (I.e. lowering demand).
And to know that, we'd need extensive and extremely controversial studies. Beyond that, even in the event allowing this stuff to be generated is an overall positive (and I don't know whether it would or won't), will many politicians actually call for this stuff to be allowed? Seems like the kind of thing that could ruin a political career. Nobody's touching that with a ten foot pole.
It’s so much simpler than that—it can be created now, so it will be. They will use narrative twists to post it on the clearnet, just like they do with anime (she’s really a 1000 year old vampire, etc.). Creating laws to allow it are simply setting the rules of the phenomenon that is already going to be happening.
The only question is whether or not politicians will stop mud slinging long enough to have an adult conversation, or will we just shove everything into the more obscure parts of the internet and let it police itself.
what is the law's position on AI-generated child porn?
Already illegal here in the UK https://metro.co.uk/2025/02/02/makers-ai-child-abuse-images-jailed-uk-introduces-world-first-law-22481459/
I think the concern is that although it's victimless, if it's legal it could.... Normalise (within certain circles) the practice. This might make the users more confident to do something that does create a victim.
Additionally, how do you tell if it's really or generated? If AI does get better, how do you tell?
what is the law’s position on AI-generated child porn?
Pretend underage porn is illegal in the EU and some other countries. I believe, in the US it is protected by the first amendment.
Mind that when people talk about child porn or CSAM that means anything underage, as far as politics is concerned. When two 17-year-olds exchange nude selfies, that is child porn. There were some publicized cases of teens in the US being convicted as pedophile sex offenders for sexting.
what is the law’s position on AI-generated child porn?
the simplest possible explanation here, is that any porn created based on images of children, is de facto illegal. If it's trained on adults explicitly, and you prompt it for child porn, that's a grey area, probably going to follow precedent for drawn art, rather than real content.
Let's play devils advocate. You find Bob the pedophile with pictures depicting horrible things. 2 things are true.
A third factor is that this technology and the inherent lack of privacy on the internet could potentially pinpoint numerous unknown pedophiles who can even if they haven't done any harm yet be profitably persecuted to societies ultimate profit so long as you value innocent kids more than perverts.
i have no problem with ai porn assuming it's not based on any real identities, i think that should be considered identity theft or impersonation or something.
Outside of that, it's more complicated, but i don't think it's a net negative, people will still thrive in the porn industry, it's been around since it's been possible, i don't see why it wouldn't continue.
Refresh for a new fake person
I've found that there's a lot of things on the Internet that went wrong because it was ad supported for "free". Porn is one of them.
There is ethically produced porn out there, but you're going to have to pay for it. Incidentally, it also tends to be better porn overall. The versions of the videos they put up on tube sites are usually cut down, and are only part of their complete library. Up through 2012 or so, the tube sites were mostly pirated content, but then they came to an agreement with the mainstream porn industry. Now it's mostly the studios putting up their own content (plus independent, verified creators), and anything pirated gets taken down fast.
Anyway, sites like Crash Pad Series, Erika Lust, Vanessa Cliff, and Adulttime (the most mainstream of this list) are worth a subscription fee.
without a victim
It was trained on something.
It can generate combinations of things that it is not trained on, so not necessarily a victim. But of course there might be something in there, I won't deny that.
However the act of generating something does not create a new victim unless there is someones likeness and it is shared? Or is there something ethical here, that I am missing?
(Yes, all current AI is basically collective piracy of everyones IP, but besides that)
yeah bro wait until you discover where neural networks got that idea from
without a victim
You are wrong.
AI media models has to be trained on real media. The illegal content would mean illegal media and benefiting ,supporting, & profiting from and to victims of crime.
The lengths and fallacies pedophiles will go to justify themselves is absurd.
Excuse me? I am very offended by your insinuations here. It honestly makes me not want to share my thought and opinions at all. I am not in any way interested in this kind of content.
I encourage you to read my other posts in the different threads here and see. I am not an apologist, and do not condone it either.
I do genuinely believe AI can generate content it is not trained on, that's why I claimed it can generate illegal content without a victim. Because it can combine stuff from things it is trained on and end up with something original.
I am interested in learning and discussing the consequences of an emerging and novel technology on society. This is a part of that. Even if it is uncomfortable to discuss.
You made me wish I didn't..
Oh my God! That's disgusting! AI porn online!? Where!? Where do they post those!? There's so many of them, though. Which one?
Fucking disgusting unethical shit. Tell me where to find it so I can avoid it pls.
pop is funny
I'm a representative of the American pornographical societies of America and I would like to educate myself and others in this disgusting AI de-generated graphical content for the purpose of informing my friends and family about this. Could we please have a link?
Good.
Hot take but I think AI porn will be revolutionary and mostly in a good way. Sex industry is extremely wasteful and inefficient use of our collective time that also often involves a lot of abuse and dark business practices. It's just somehow taboo to even mention this.
Sometimes you come across a video and you are like 'oh this. I need more of THIS.'
And then you start tailoring searches to try find more of the same but you keep getting generic or repeated results because the lack of well described/defined content overuse of video TAGs (obviously to try get more views with a large net rather than being specific).
But would i watch AI content if i could feed it a description of what i want? Hell yeah!
I mean there are only so many videos of girls giving a blowjob while he eats tacos and watches old Black & White documentaries about the advancements of mechanical production processes.
I hate it when you find a good video, it does the job really well, so a few days later you're like, yeah let's watch that one again, you type in every single description you can about the video and find everything else but the video you want and they're barely anywhere near as good.
Hell I'd take an AI porn search engine for now, let me describe in detail what the video I'm looking for is so I can finally see it again.
Yes, but will also hurt the very workers' bottom line, and with some clever workarounds, it'll be used to fabricate defamatory material other methods were not good at.
Even Onlyfans girls and boys will lose their jobs because of AI :(
What's the URL for this generator so I can avoid it?
Definitely don't click on this link otherwise you might try to install an AI locally
This is Lemmy. Why not self host the generation? :)
Who are the girls in the picture? We can do this, team. Left to right, starting at the top.
To which I have to say... good on them for using AI porn in the least bad way? (IE realistic fictional characters instead of real people that did not consent to the depictions being made of them).
That’s mostly what AI Porn land is now, as animation is easier and hence fictional characters are easier. Trainers also tend to exclude real people from base models.
#1 Gwen Stacy?
Added
#1 is markiplier
I would find it hard to believe if Jessica Rabbit wasn't somewhere there, probably 6? Although the hair style doesn't quite match.
The world has forgotten about Mrs Rabbit, sadly.
My friend wants to know if it can generate VR videos too?
Take anything created, ffmpeg it into frames, then run it through this script's stereoscopic mode:
https://github.com/thygate/stable-diffusion-webui-depthmap-script
Asking the real questions
Tell your friend that my friend is also asking too.
Theoretically? Maybe.
There are already networks to generate depth maps out of 2D video, so hooking up the output to that and a simpler VR video encoder should probably work.
Will it be jank as hell? Oh yeah. Nothing is conveniently packaged in Local AI Land, unfortunately.
this is gonna take rule 34 to a whole another level
It's really called Wanx?
If you build it, they will porn.
Why you think the net was born? 🎶
For porn 🎶
That's disgusting! Where?
ai porn is dull. ill take poorly drawn heinous fetish art over your ai generated slop.
Yeah, but I'm sure it'll improve in time. I can't really see what's the point of AI porn though, unless it's to make images of someone who doesn't consent, which is shit. For everything else, regular porn has it covered and looks better too.
Anime/semi-real style is already shockingly good.
It's pleasing to the eye but lacks the soul and passion of a real, human gooner who just wants to make people cum
Is that JINX?
I dont like that i was able to tell
fucking saw it too 😅
Ye
Yes, here's the link to the uncensored clip, NSFW obviously, but you'll need to put in an email to turn off NSFW filtering. https://civitai.com/images/60144368
The censored images in the thumbnail were all pulled from uploaded videos from this Lora on Civati called "Better Titfuck (WAN and HunYuan)"
I didn't know who that was before looking it up and I totally thought you were taking about the Pokemon lol
*Aliboobie
Finally, my dream of making black gay porn is realized
It’s time like this that I think, ahhh, the Internet never truly changed :D
Atleast don't censor the photos so for educational purposes only we can collectively judge if this AI art is indeed worth a damn.
What I find incredible is that they named this thing WanX, which can alternatively be pronounced Wanks. Nominative Determinism at its finest
This is the way.
I am looking forward to this becoming common and effective. Being able to generate animated hentai in assorted styles would be neat. Lina Inverse getting boinked by Donald Duck could be a thing.
Lina Inverse getting boinked by Donald Duck could be a thing.
You can 100% already do this, with high quality, locally. Generate an image with PonyXL (and Lora’s if it doesn’t get the characters quite perfect), do img2vid with Hunyuan or this.
The catch is that it’s all unreasonably user unfriendly to set up, and most online UIs are remarkably shit. Basically AI land just needs a few more “integrators” to plug this stuff into each other and package it sanely (as opposed to researchers just throwing papers out or “entrepeneurs” making shome shitty closed cloud UI), some better hardware support, and you’re already there with no new models/tech.
Ok I checked it out, why are there so many people with boobs and with 3 foot cocks? Talk about unrealistic body expectations.
Well, genetic engineering is advancing at a good clip.
I hate how mainstream media is always underrepresenting the size of the typical cock.
I have a 3 foot cock. Well as long as they’re mouse feet.
Check out this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernormal_stimulus
I bet it's all trained on amouranth stuff based on the pixelated images
no examples?
Nice
Pics or it didn't happen.
I feel like this should be a real tattoo….
This is going to destroy what’s left of the social fabric
You mean deep fakes? Yeah it's really a not great development
Disgusting AI 🤒
