Name technology/technologies that you like (or even dislike maybe) that aren't just consumer electronics/software. So much discussion of technology is just new computer stuff.
Hopin' China's reforesting tech proves sustainable. Also Prolekult/James Bell was mentioning hempcrete, which is another that I'd think would help a lot. Hopin' for new sword technology. . .
Democratic Germany produced a brand of glassware named Superfest. Through an innovative production process it was eight times harder than other types of glass making a Superfest glass very hard to break.
Planners in democratic Germany believed Superfest to have great potential as an export since it was superior to competing products. It turned out they were wrong, western distributors of glassware were not interested in selling their customers a glass that lasted and reduced the need to buy replacements. Following the annexation of democratic Germany the organisation tasked with dismantling Democratic Germany's industrial economy, the Treuhand, shut down the plant and abandoned the patent.
And that's why we can't have durable pint glasses under capitalism.
Why would someone make it now? Selling people a glass every six months is going to be a better businesses proposition than selling them one that lasts every five years.
modern tubeless tires are fucking magic. I drove a screw into my fucking bike tire and not only did my tire self seal around the screw and leave a tap to unscrew it, but when I did unscrew it my tire fucking healed itself.
In the assumed lifespan of nigh everyone on this here website chapo.chat, so since about the 80s, bicycle tyres especially have made insane heaps and bounds as per durability. The Schwalbe Marathon or Gatorskins are basically unkillable unless you drive a nail through them by chance but even the durability level 1 of 5 stuff is so much less prone to punctures than even stuff from the early 2000s and without necessarily feeling like riding brick over sandpaper
V-Brake brakepads have also gotten very, very good if you know what to buy and it's not even really the expensive stuff
Dynamo tech with the hub dynamo and then especially paired to LED lights are also a godsend from turning a bicycle light into "you can be seen and safely ride at walking speeds" to "just fucking bomb down this pitchblack road with" and again, this isn't like the expensive stuff from lezyne or whatever, it can be had on the cheap.
E-Bikes! My god what a revolutionary thing E-Bikes are, yet what potential wasted by dumbass laws and urban planning still.
The Schwalbe Marathon or Gatorskins are basically unkillable unless you drive a nail through them by chance but even the durability level 1 of 5 stuff is so much less prone to punctures than even stuff from the early 2000s and without necessarily feeling like riding brick over sandpaper
That was my number one reason for ditching bikes. I hated riding to a place and then walking home 12 km because I'd somehow gotten another flat.
Also riding on the footpath because I'm a slow cyclist and didn't feel safe riding with cats or other cyclists
To get retro, the question wasn't posed about new tech in sepcific, I'll add to say an internal 3 speed hub is magic so god damned nice. Especially one of those old bikes where the whole thing was made in 1 factory, they're like riding on butter.
E bikes are not my thing so far but seem to be the smart thing and opposition is blatant racism.
The way China has incorporated drones into daily urban life is pure scifi. Like, the drones are just consumer electronics, but I'm also talking about the infrastructure that goes into making sure you can actually support thousands upon thousands of drones. The drones themselves should be seen as part of city infrastructure in the same way a bridge or a street lamp is as well.
The CSIRO made a thing called RAFT that can sequence polymers however you want and it can help with everything from bank notes to vaccines. It's amazing stuff and needs to be known about more
Low-end coffee hand grinders have gotten a whole lot better in the last 15 years or so.
Many years ago I bought what was a widely recommended coffee hand grinder made by Hario. It had a ceramic mill. It's frustratingly slow and tedious.
Got a Timemore like two years ago, which has a stainless steel mill and they added some teeth into the mill design, which does sort of a rough shredding of the beans before they go into the lower fine milling, which makes this super fast and quite low effort. Takes less than a minute per cup. It's also prettier and just better designed in every way when compared with the Hario. According to reviews the resulting grain consistency is pretty good and it can go quite fine, fine enough for espresso even, though I wouldn't know anything about that.
The home coffee game really has massively evolved in recent years. For a long time a Rancilio Rocky and Silvia were your way to producing a sort of crappy home espresso. Now there's too many options to name, and the affordability floor keeps coming down with higher and higher quality products. The Legato / Apex has a feature set rivaling machines three times the cost.
Hydroponics. Requires some setup but once it's in place you have plants growing while consuming up to 90% less water than traditional agriculture, and it's easy to make the whole system totally passive so that the only labor inputs are putting in new plants and harvesting old ones.
It also turns out that some plants really benefit from being grown hydroponically - put them under a grow light and in a greenhouse and you can grow multiple times as much produce on the same parcel of land while consuming less water and fertilizer to do it.
It's a process that can be scaled up industrially, but because of the high upfront cost it's fairly rare, the most mature industrial greenhouses are those in The Netherlands. Once a farm has made the transition there are logistical advantages to hydroponics as well - a farm can stagger grow times to have consistent smaller harvests instead of one or two massive harvests, making staffing and income more consistent.
Not every plant can be grown this way, but those that can absolutely should. Especially in places like California where I live, where we have the financial and technological ability to do so and our environment would greatly benefit from reduced water use.
Can you fit a current-day hydroponics rig for 'personal use' into an apartment? A lot of why my partners and I are trying to stick out a house for as long as possible is access to land we can grow herbs and veggies in; but having a way to do it in an apartment would be a considerable weight off my shoulders regarding a potential downsizing.
You could definitely put a grow light and a dutch bucket in a closet. My home setup started at about $100 and consisted of some white buckets with holes drilled into them (it's way more expensive now but that's cuz I bought a greenhouse, solar panels, space heater, a big battery...).
Trains: specially maglevs. To be kind of honest I’m a massive technophobe especially after feeling like I’m too stupid for STEM, but there are some tech I fully appreciate.
Prosthetic limbs: I don’t have any, but it’s pretty cool seeing how far medicine has come.
A lot of medical breakthroughs are very fascinating
Seeing advancements in green energy is always nice. For example, I really like Quebec’s hydroelectricity and hydro-quebec seems to be something they’re proud of. Makes my Ohioan yank ass very jealous.
I wish I was good enough for STEM, because working on some of these technologies does sound sincerely fascinating
Hydro Quebec and the North American hydro infrastructure generally are built on fucking over the indigenous residents of the land though. HQ in particular kept flooding sacred indigenous lands to make reservoirs, sometimes starting the projects without warning and sometimes breaking treaties to do it.
Speaking of cooking, I'm not sure when these came out, but the newer type of can opener that cuts the lid from the side so it sits on top of the can instead of falling in is great. I think I just happened to get one around 10 years ago when a friend moved and gave away a bunch of stuff. I almost threw it out because I thought maybe it was broken (I was using it incorrectly).
Every time I'm in a friend's kitchen and we open a can with the old style, it makes me want to get them one because the older style is harder to use.
Very old cookbooks would tell you to cook food until it was done.
Old cookbooks would make assumptions about your skills and not explain what julienne was. Also a lot of volume measurements.
Modern cookbooks will frequently have instructions on the techniques they require, with images, and measure everything in mass units. It's a smoother experience.
Electric micromobility vehicles (e-bikes, e-scooters, e-unicycles, etc) are sort of consumer electronics, but they're still pretty great. The range and speed are much more able to cope with horrible suburban sprawl than an ordinary bicycle so they're more viable as car replacements for more people.
I like the super-flexy rubbery ice cube trays where you can just push the cubes out through the bottom into the glass without touching them. Ice cubes in the fridge door are fine, too.
The technology of zea mays (corn). It was intentionally genetically engineered from the non-food Teosinte. I do not think the process by which this happened is currently understood by the collective of science. Then it formed a part of the Three Sisters. Unclear if this was part of the plan all along.
Do you have any specific info to share or just an opinion? Based on what?
I understand sea mays is different than the development of other grains because the original plant was not food. Corn is a totally different organizism, not just a more suitable variety. Specific traits that were not previously present were introduced.
An interesting example is maize (corn). Biologists have discovered that maize was developed from a wild plant called teosinte. Through traditional breeding practices, humans living thousands of years ago in what is now Southern Mexico began selecting for desirable traits until they were able to transform the plant into what is now known as maize. In doing so, they permanently (and unknowingly) altered its genetic instructions, allowing for new traits to emerge. Considering this history, we might ask the question: is there really such a thing as “non-GMO” maize?
I saw a prototype of a new type of single-thread chainstitch sewing machine. It has a swiveling part that twists the loop before the hook catches it, supposedly making it as resistant to unraveling as a standard lockstitch. There are probably good reasons why the inventor still hasn't attracted capital (or maybe shady anti-competitive ones?), but I'd still love to play with the prototype
edit: my bad it's actually a two-thread chainstitch