If someone with a fairly good life does it, what do you think someone capitalism and greed has driven to desperation might do now that we've seen how wildly effective it is?
If someone with a fairly good life does it, what do you think someone capitalism and greed has driven to desperation might do now that we've seen how wildly effective it is?
So, totally unrelated, but like hypothetically, how illegal would it be to start printing guns and giving them to people with terminal illnesses who were denied coverage? No reason in particular
Well remember the Republicans think gun control is bad, so.
It's almost like they're begging for it.
You can’t manufacture a gun for somebody else unless you’re a registered gun manufacturer. You can only make one for yourself. You can hypothetically sell/give a printed gun to someone if when you made it you didn’t intend on selling or distributing it, however many states require you to transfer that firearm via a dealer.
You would have to give/loan your cancer patient a 3d printer and maybe suggest a URL. They would have to construct the firearm themselves without help.
you can't murder people in the streets without having a badge.
yet ...
You worry about the legality of printing a gun when you want to give it to someone to use for murder?
What about pieces of a gun?
What if five people printed five different parts and traded them?
What if the pieces have multiple purposes, only one of which is part of the assembly of a gun?
Illegal. But look into 80% lower receivers for more info.
Straw purchases are illegal. So only if they can prove it
That's not how 3DP2A works. The "thing" that has to be registered is the polymer frame (on a semiautomatic handgun). That polymer frame is at least what gets printed. So if you're printing a handgun, there's no registerable purchase.