Skip Navigation
What's the story you would write if you were an author?
  • Over the next 100 years or so VR and haptic tech make it so people can become fully emersed in virtual reality. So pretty much everyone does. There are arguments on both sides, but eventually most people choose to live in their own world as a "god" with only VR interaction between one another. Everyone in VR stops having real kids, but thanks to AI improvements they can still have "kids". Technology eventually allows people to plug in permanently while their bodies are maintained by AI and robots systems. Eventually their bodies die, but their consciousness has been captured enough by the system that no one knows or notices when their VR friends bodies die in reality.

    In the real world a very small segment of society refuses to join the VR universe and pledge to remain in the real world. Maybe there's some war in there because of this. Eventually though, the population of earth drops to maybe a few hundred thousand mostly wandering communal groups, while everyone else's consciousness is in VR systems. This is good for the planet.

    After a few thousand years, the people in reality have multiplied and built a better more equitable world, but have completely forgotten about the people in VR, and the automated buildings containing the computers have become buried and lost to time. Until one day someone stumbles across one of these ruins and begins interacting with the VR people again despite a mythical belief system that such technology is all bad.

    Some shit happens and there's a VR vs reality reckoning... Maybe some sort of Romeo and Juliet love story to keep it interesting.

  • Joe sniffing hair tho
  • Interesting... I assumed the down votes were most likely from Biden fans who hate it when people say him and Trump both suck.

    And of course both sides of the establishment coin would down vote any hint of a suggestion that we need ranked choice voting

  • Fuck this guy.
  • Tie it to inflation and end taxes on individuals... It makes no sense to distribute UBI and then tax it. Just tax the whole bill for society to the corporations. That incentivizes corporations to put pressure on each other to keep prices down and make products that last. There are definitely some industries that should be owned by the state though.

  • I'm a psychologist—doomscrolling has a devastating impact
  • Okay, I get this... Hell I FEEL this, even though I only scroll through Lemmy. But let's say I do want to stay informed, but don't want it to just be info about the bad stuff: does anyone know of a good source that aggregates all the good stuff people are doing? Like what's the squad up to? Who's fighting to take back power from the corporations? Who's fighting and winning? Who's inventing ways to stop climate change? That kind of stuff... Not so much the cutsie "I have a crush on my husband" stuff

  • The world is running out of soldiers
  • This is kinda how I feel when liberals keep arguing for Biden. What I hear them saying is "Vote for Biden because at least he's only making THEIR life miserable... Trump will make MY life miserable! (And I might actually have to start caring!)"

    It sucks that people only care about the world's misery when they are personally threatened, but since that seems to be the way it is, maybe letting Trump make everyone miserable will speed things along a bit/get more people to wake up and fight back?

    (Mostly playing devil's advocate here... I do think we should be trying to stop Trump... Just wish the DNC was trying too)

  • The US needs to build 2 million houses to revive the American dream of homeownership
  • 10-15% of household in the US are "housing insecure"... There's 127m households... So about 15 million housing insecure families. I think we should go with that. You're probably right that the 600k is street homeless. Many people are "homeless sheltered" meaning they can couch surf, or the state is putting them in a motel, or whatever.

  • Economics @lemmy.world Wes4Humanity @lemm.ee
    What if we ended all taxes on individuals, and just charged the cost of society to the corporations?

    This idea has been kicking around in my head for a while, and I'm hoping some Lemmy geniuses can poke holes/ flesh it out with me.

    Every person I've ever heard of works for and gets paid by some form of company. So instead of the company paying the workers and then those workers getting taxed, why not just tax it all to the corporations to begin with? Instead of hundreds of millions of individuals to think about, the IRS (in US) could just focus on a few million companies.

    We the people democratically decide what we think is needed for a functioning society, and charge it to the corporations.

    I'd say each company should be responsible for paying the same percentage of the bill as percentage of total "profits" they made. Like, if Apple makes 10% of all the combined profits of all the companies this quarter, they are responsible for paying 10% of the bill. Highest paid employee can make 10x what the lowest paid employee (including contracted and foreign workers) makes; more than that gets included in the calculation as part of the company's "profits". (So that CEO can still get paid absurd amounts of money, but the company will still pay taxes on most of it)

    What if we created some sort of secure opinion/voting app where people go to cast their vote on whatever people think needs to be voted on. Should there be UBI? Should it be a token, living, or thriving wage? (Personally, I'd go with thriving and tie it to inflation) Single payer healthcare? All education paid for? Stop funding genocide? No more polluting the planet, or at least force companies to pay to clean up their own messes? When and where are companies allowed to market to us? Where should the threshold of agreement be to enact changes, 40% 50%+1 60%? Etc etc

    Then we elect people who agree to simply enact what the people democratically agree on... And if the people don't agree, they'll stay away from it or leave it to the states. And hopefully someday we could build it out so that state and local governments work this way too.

    I think we get bogged down on the 2 or 3 things we disagree on and allow that to mean we never get the things we DO agree on. Let's get the things we agree on first, and then continue debating the things we disagree on.

    Also I think this would be a long term plan. 12 years would give us 2 full election cycles here in the US and would give zoomers time to grow up, settle, and start to really vote (hopefully with this new system).

    Anyway, like I said, let's poke holes and figure out solutions. Thanks

    0
    InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)WE
    Wes4Humanity @lemm.ee
    Posts 1
    Comments 211