In a Tight Presidential Race, Third-Party Candidates Present a Wild Card
In a Tight Presidential Race, Third-Party Candidates Present a Wild Card
"OP has stated that they have no issues with a Trump victory and constantly floods the feed with pro Trump propaganda. They will only engage in bad faith and refuse to take responsibility for the things they post. The people controlling this account are here solely for political purposes and have no interest in anything other than harming this community."
Keep that in mind. I didn't write this, just posting what someone else wrote. Thanks!
I didn’t vote for Trump. And I don’t care if he wins. I didn’t vote for Harris. And I don’t care if she wins.
I don’t like either one of them.
My post history is public, so not sure why you think that’s some big “gotcha” moment. In fact, here’s the direct link to my post history: https://lemmy.world/u/UniversalMonk?page=1&sort=New&view=Posts
Thank you! :)
Take it up with the authors of the comment. Clearly people agree with them. I just post what I find interesting.
That's all they're good for.
You are a shit person from an evil country. Go eat a fucking bullet. Suicide is the answer.
Plenty of people are fed up with the Duopoly. If they don’t like that, then maybe they should focus on actually appealing to voters instead of pushing them away.
Personally, since I’ve been on Lemmy, I’ve become even more turned off by Democrats—the hate and vitriol I’ve seen is worse than anything I’ve encountered from Republicans.
I didn’t vote for either party when I cast my vote yesterday, and I don’t see that changing anytime soon.
Right, because you voted for Pro-Israel candidate Rachele Fruit. Quoted earlier this year:
And anyone who is interested in reading and learning about the history of Hamas will be convinced that it’s not about liberation. It’s about genocide against the Jews.
"OP has stated that they have no issues with a Trump victory and constantly floods the feed with pro Trump propaganda. They will only engage in bad faith and refuse to take responsibility for the things they post. The people controlling this account are here solely for political purposes and have no interest in anything other than harming this community."
Keep that in mind. I didn't write this, just posting what someone else wrote. Thanks!
I didn’t vote for Trump. And I don’t care if he wins. I didn’t vote for Harris. And I don’t care if she wins.
I don’t like either one of them.
My post history is public, so not sure why you think that’s some big “gotcha” moment. In fact, here’s the direct link to my post history: https://lemmy.world/u/UniversalMonk?page=1&sort=New&view=Posts
Thank you! :)
Take it up with the authors of the comment. Clearly people agree with them. I just post what I find interesting.
Mr. Tamas said this was an overly simplistic view of the 2016 outcome, which he has studied. Many of the people who voted for Ms. Stein were unlikely to have voted for any other candidate. Some would have picked Mr. Trump if she had not been on the ballot.
The last real spoiler supported by evidence, Mr. Tamas said, was ... in 2000Silver lining here - all the money the GOP is spending to spoil the election has gone to waste if this is correct.
Actually, even better,
it was difficult to determine whether Mr. Trump or Ms. Harris will benefit most.
Meaning there's a chance that the GOP spending here turns out to rather ironically help Harris!
New York Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for New York Times:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this sourceSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/14/us/politics/presidential-election-third-party-candidates.html