Judge in US v. Google trial didn’t know if Firefox is a browser or search engine
Judge in US v. Google trial didn’t know if Firefox is a browser or search engine
arstechnica.com
Judge in US v. Google trial didn’t know if Firefox is a browser or search engine
Google accused DOJ of aiming to force people to use “inferior” search products.
This is not the first thing I have heard troubling about judge Mehta regarding this case. He also ruled that it would not be considered that Google employees and executives purposely destroyed evidence related to the case. It’s not a good sign for the antitrust argument with a judge like this.
We definitely need technology judges and legislatures with a history in the industry or robust training. They make and rule on the laws and they don't even understand the subjects they're legislating.
They need the judge that heard the Google Oracle API case - actually seemed to understand the implications of copyrighting APIs