Hello everyone
I am an avid practitioners of martial arts. Started with Judo and Jiu Jitsu. Then my health and phisical condition degraded due to external causes. I switched to Aikido for three years and now Tai chi chuan, which I am now strongly committing to.
Aside from obvious positive effects (balance and agility) I wonder what you all think about inner martial arts.
I tend to ingest as little taoist folklore as I can, not because I think it's not interesting, but I want to avoid the exotic sounding mysticism tailored to impress westerners as a kind of new age marketing strategy. Fortunately, my teacher is a medical doctor working in the field of work related injuries.
I know I love Tai Chi Chuan and I truly mean to get better at it, but I can't ignore all the... weird stuff connected to it (no, Mr. Grand Master, I refuse to think that you single handedly pushed 10 people by the power of chi mastery). At the same time, I've been impressed by how, sometimes, finding adequate balance can make you able to sustain a strong push without even making active use of muscular strength.
So Il just wondering how you feel about this (or the other) inner martial art.
For me, it's a demanding and rewarding practice, full of great health and self discipline benefits and a few truly impressive perks, but with a..weird decorum I can't begin to understand.
Noncombative martial arts like Tai Chi derived from the need to hone skills like balance and flexibility separately from combat. Even though they contribute to better fighting they have personal benefits for non-fighters as well. Especially as people age. You could also learn the more harmful martial arts if that's your goal, but you'll find the skills learned in the noncombative class will help you win with less harm to your own body.
Oh I certainly am! But after trying to read a few studies about inner arts measurable effect, I'm left with more questions than answer, so I wanted to ask Lemmy's collective knowledge and impressions.
It's good as a form of physical meditation. Supposedly some speculate taichi may have been a training art for actual practical grappling arts like shuai jiao.
I agree with you about the "weird stuff". I teach Tai Chi and I'm very careful about the words I use, especially when it comes to describing mechanical forces. I'll often mention that I don't mean some notion of "life force" but rather the physical Newtonian force that your body is subject to while performing the movements.
I find Tai Chi to be deceptively complicated with deep physical and psychological components. I have a hard time articulating what it is to others since it's not really a martial art, and it's not really meditation, and it's not just a bunch of movements or calisthenics. But it does have very real effects and I love it!
It sounds like your experience is quite similar to mine and I'm happy you found a good teacher and are enjoying the practice! 😀
I'm really out of practice, but I remember that onion fondly. My teacher would have us write our fundamental principles down and then do it again a year later and compare.
Eh, I find it easy to ignore the woowoo bullshit. Always have.
That being said, the benefits are there. It's a form of meditation, and exercise, all rolled into one. That's always a good thing.
Now, I enjoy the Taoist and Buddhist stuff. On paper, that's the religions I give when a quick and simple answer is needed. The Buddhist side of things actually is as close to religion as I get nowadays, and the Taoist side of things is an interesting way of looking at the universe. But neither approaches what you'd call Belief. It's more that they fit well enough as an approximation of the way I think and feel about existence.
Tbh, it helps in breaking loose of assumptions built up from living in the western world, the same as western ways of thinking would help break free of assumptions built up from eastern ways of thinking. And that's what matters to me, keeping my assumptions from keeping me from thinking and learning.
That's a nice perspective. Whenever I have some free time, I'd like to dive into taoist vision a bit below the surface level. Some assumptions of Buddhism I can't relate to. Maybe this one will be less directly opposing my deep beliefs. Anyway, it's always interesting to learn, even if I end up disagreeing.
I tried Aikido for a while and did some Qui Gong as well. I see your point about the BS floating around, but the physical and also mental benefits are undeniable. It may vary from person to person, the same way some people can't meditate, some won't get anything from these types of activities.
I've trained Wu style for a while and there wasn't any mysticism in the school I was in. We also did a lot of application and sparring, including sparring with other martial arts schools. I think the core principles of the principles of the art are sound, and it can work as an effective fighting style.
That said, I find it really depends on how it is taught. A lot of schools just focus on doing the forms, and they don't bother with application. It's fine if you're doing it to develop body awareness, balance, and so on. However, I don't think it's possible to learn to apply a fighting style without actually doing sparring.
Stories about masters single handedly pushing 10 people using the power of chi are just tall tales in my experience. You can get a lot of power by learning to get the most out of body mechanics, but at the end of the day there's no magic and it's just physics.
To me it's just a passion some ppl have. I used to be more into it (never did it), but as with every passion, you can get blinded by the flashiness of the people who wanna sell you a specific technique or way to do something.
I think you are right, one can get trapped very easily in the pitfalls of the superhuman, but the actual benefits are rooted in the basic.
Other examples: there's a lot of benefits to general fitness exercises, but the fitness bros will sell you their one and only way to get extremely muscular (which most people don't even start out striving for). Or games, where people push you to be the very best, although the actual benefit is in having fun and keeping your brain sharp. Or creative hobbies, where a lot of people strive for the spotlight, but the actual benefit is when you do it for yourself and do what you want, regardless of what other people think.
There sure is a lot of flashy myths and fantasies in this branch of martial arts. Sometimes, my fellow practitioners truly believe in Chi as a mystical force allowing one to get superhuman abilities, which is a bit frightening tbh. I'm not counting daoism among said fantasies and myth. I'm still ignorant about its meaning.
So yes, I guess you're right.
The thing with meditation and repetitive physical practicing can easily have something like chi that descibes the feeling of getting thigs right in a way that some people take literally magic. Like how focusing on moving something can feel effortless because practice has made it a whole body motion. Or how thinking about punching past something makes it easier to hit it harder because your brain is less likely to subconciously pull back on impact.
The mental part of martial arts is like medidation. There are real world benefits, both mental and physical, and having a long history that intertwines mysticism means a lot of people are going to start to believe their own hype.
But this, I can't explain : https://youtu.be/4yv34VZGeqs. Do people really believe in this? Can suggestion be that impressively strong?
That guy is my teacher's master and he deeply respects him as an incredible martial artist. And my teacher and several students seem to follow a 0 bs policy.
But... how can not one question this.. kinda grotesque scene?
That video!! Yeah, I don't believe it either. Sort of reminds me of doing Kung Fu as a kid. We'd do public demonstrations and would sometimes ham it up a bit for the audience. I wonder if that's what's going on.
Have you practiced push hands? There's a neat effect I can only describe as sort of being able to bounce off the other person. You can get some decent air with it! I also wonder if there's a bit of that going on with a lot of exaggeration.
Hahahahaha how can you take anyone like that serious? People really are amazing and considering how many vote for Trump for probably the same basic reason I should absolutely not laugh about this. It is dead serious having to deal with this kind of human behavior.
As I would have a few years ago. But I'm an old man now and leave it to younger people. Of course, I'm quite happy to still have long earned reflexes from my practice of external arts, in case I need them one day..
This might be intersting to you – he talks about the difference between philosophical Daoism (like the Daodejing) and religious Daoism (the "weird decorum" you mention). Also this
I practice "internal" and "external" kung fu and first things first... All real kung fu is both. If your Shifu is teaching both the internal and external aspects of the art then you are getting the full experience. Any martial art was developed for fighting, however there can be a very fulfilling experience when you connect the mind and body during training and execution. It sounds like your teacher has you on a good path.
All of the fake martial arts (from no-touch knockouts and kayfabe wrestling) have given me a bad impression of martial arts in general. If you're not mystifying your arts or trying to pass them off as something they're not to impressionable and vulnerable people, hey you're good. But I'm still internally lumping them all together as scams in my head.
I've done some karate, wu shu(gong/Kung fu), and Tai chi. Thankfully, my instructors never got into the BS of chi or Feng shui.
I do think doing the physical work without accompanying mental work is missing out on some stuff though. Your physical status goes along with mental status and vice versa. Whether you choose to perceive that as chi, chakras, or just plain mental control(what I choose) is up to you.
Yes, my instructors sometimes uses "chi" but quickly autocorrects himself "let's say breathing". I think the mental work taichi implies for me is striving for "perfection" in the moves, while remaining calm.
As with almost any type of repetitive training the key gain is to reduce / eliminate thinking time to maximise reaction time. Whether that be fire training, first aid or a body motion the principal is the same. The difference between trying to remember versus simply knowing.
While I'm not familiar with the practices of Tai Chi and its history, I am familiar with the stories and mysticism of "inner" martial arts and chi due to my cultural background. I've always been fascinated with martial arts and kung fu, and have recently taken up karate and its cultural histories. I also have a degree in kinesiology and will agree that the human body is such a complex and fascinating subject. The word "chi" or "ki" literally means air or in the context of martial arts, breath, and I will associate it as such. In every martial arts that I've seen, breathing is always a subject in the forefront. But as far as listening to tall tale stories and feats that chi can achieve, I always smile and nod but take it with a grain of salt
Indeed. I really like my teacher because he quite often avoids to pepper notions that would sound mystic because we're ignorant of them. He gave us the exact approach to "chi" that the one you're describing.
Not sure entirely where this fits into this conversation, but one thing I've found really interesting that's discussed in this Convo w Dr. K (I don't have a timestamp sorry). Tai Chi has much more significant affect on all health perspectives than typical Western running/jogging/yoga etc.
And research papers can note this, but as soon as researchers start attempting to dig into the actual mechanical process behind why it has such a significant affect, their papers will be rejected because it dips too far into Woo/Spiritual territory despite not describing what the woo is, just acknowledging that "something" is there happening.
I think it's interesting we can measure results and attempt to explain what we're seeing but western research tends to be so tied to physical mechanisms it has almost started hindering our advancement.
If I was doing one it would be something like that as I would say im getting old but that was a decade back. If I was young and in great shape im fine with tai chi, yoga, meditation and supplemental type of thing but I would not really look at it as martial art as much as excersise.
I trained tai chi and a little ba gua.
I sparred a little with some karate and take kwon do people. I cleaned up.
I did some light sparring with a ba gua guy and he was literally throwing me around effortlessly.
I was taught well. I would imagine that my teacher was 1/1000. When looking for him, I found at least 5 different schools that had no idea what they were doing and teaching tai chi anyways.
IDK, but I tried Muay Thai and can attest that it has the mystical power of hitting and kicking people really fucking hard. I could throw a large man, but it was by shoving him with my foot (called a teep, they're great). I tried a little Tai Chi when I was younger and it does seem like it would be awesome for balance and maybe some core strength type stuff but I have to imagine its efficacy in an actual fight is not on par with something more practical like Muay Thai, Jui JItsu, Boxing, etc.
I think knowing it could still help if you get attacked, but the real danger that will probably get most of us is being too inactive and Tai Chi seems pretty great in defending against that.
Yes. It could help somehow, in the ways you described, but I wouldn't recommend it (at least how it's taught in the West) at all for someone who wants to learn how to actual fight, or needs some explosive action from martial practice.