South Carolina executes first man in 13 years despite new evidence of innocence
South Carolina executes first man in 13 years despite new evidence of innocence
Khalil Divine Black Sun Allah, 46, killed by lethal injection days after state’s key witness recanted critical testimony
Khalil Divine Black Sun Allah, 46, killed by lethal injection days after state’s key witness recanted critical testimony
South Carolina executed a man on death row on Friday, days after the key witness for the prosecution came forward to say he lied at trial and the state was putting to death an innocent man.
Khalil Divine Black Sun Allah, 46, was killed by lethal injection, pronounced dead at 6.55pm, according to the Associated Press, which was one of several media witnesses to the execution.
His lawyers had filed emergency motions for a delay this week, citing new testimony suggesting he was wrongfully convicted. But the state supreme court rejected the pleas and Henry McMaster, the Republican governor, announced just before the execution that he would not be granting clemency.
South Carolina executed a man on death row on Friday, days after the key witness for the prosecution came forward to say he lied at trial and the state was putting to death an innocent man.
Absolutely vile.
Henry McMaster, John W Kirttredge, John Cannon Few, George C James Jr., David Garrison Hill, Letitia Hamilton Verdin, should be charged with conspiracy to commit murder.
The witness Steven Golden should be now tried as guilty of murder of Kalil Divine Black Sun Allah.*
I'm tired of "state" immunity when it's a few individuals doing this.
Edit: the more I think about this? The executioner should be charged with murder.
The witnesses to the execution with conspiracy as well.It needs to stop. This guy knew until his last moment of consciousness he didn't shoot that woman. This wasn't just a state murder - this was a lynching.Edit 2: Alan McCroy Wilson too. We're making a list. It sure would suck if a future president and Congress decided to make laws that removed the "protections" these people have.
Edit 3: Appreciating the constructive criticism here. I've struck the witnesses of the execution as I didn't know what the witnesses really were. I'm conflicted on Steven though. On one hand - he committed perjury, leading to an innocent man getting executed. On the other hand, we wouldn't know he was innocent without him recanting his testimony. The problem here is that if you don't do something, the obvious thing is to testify against another party in exchange for leniency and then recant it later.
The guy who came forward and recanted his testimony? I guess no one should ever do that again if they're gonna be found guilty of murder for it
Add Alan Wilson, as attonery general he refused to act.
He's on the list now.
Whenever this discussion happens in my country, where the death penalty has been abolished, I always point them to cases like this. They argue "But we will be better". Historically we have not been better, and we are only getting worse.
It is not a state's right to murder people, especially innocent ones. It's sick and a despicable misuse of power.
It’s almost like murdering people is a bad idea.
/s for non-Europeans.
The execution of a man later found to have been innocent should automatically generate a murder conviction for all the key players (those who could have done something) in the chain that put him to death.
So that would be the key witness at the trial, the prosecutors at that trial, the judges on the state Supreme Court, and the governor that refused to grant clemency.
The system needs to be held responsible when it knowingly makes mistakes and intentionally fails to correct those mistakes.
This.
As soon as it shows that the person in question is innocent, he should be released. If only doubts have arisen, then at the least the execution must be put on hold. This doesn't take a lot of brain power to underdstand, yet here we are.
Our system is so fucked up...
life of David gayle