2y ago

Steam's Oldest User Accounts Turn 20, Valve Celebrates With Special Digital Badges - IGN

www.ign.com

Some of Steam’s oldest user accounts are turning 20-years old this week, and Valve is celebrating the anniversary by handing out special digital badges featuring the original Steam colour scheme to the gaming veterans.

Steam first opened its figurative doors all the way back in September 2003, and has since grown into the largest digital PC gaming storefront in the world, which is actively used by tens of millions of players each day.

“In case anyone's curious about the odd colours, that's the colour scheme for the original Steam UI when it first launched,” commented Redditor Penndrachen, referring to the badge's army green colour scheme, which prompted a mixed reaction from players who remembered the platform's earliest days. “I joined in the first six months,” lamented Affectionate-Memory4. “I feel ancient rn.”

PC Gaming @kbin.social

geosoco @kbin.social

2y ago

Steam's Oldest User Accounts Turn 20, Valve Celebrates With Special Digital Badges - IGN

www.ign.com /articles/steams-oldest-user-accounts-turn-20-valve-celebrates-with-special-digital-badges

153 comments

Sept 12th 2003 is the date of my account. Tomorrow it turns 20. Very nice.
- Fellow sept 12th here! Never would have thought that the simple looking launcher would turnout to be one of biggest juggernaut of selling digitale games!
  Had to make a account so I could keep on playing CS 1.6. good times.
  
  Team 9/12/03 reporting in
- I'm two days behind you.
  
  "What's your friend ID"
  "123456"...
  "Okay, what's the rest of the numbers?"
  "That's it. Those ARE the numbers"
  pikachu face
- Mine doesn't turn 20 until January. I decided to wait a bit to see if it would actually fail first.
  
  I hated the idea of an installer to install programs that had their own installers. It seemed like a pointless extra program to me, so I resisted getting it until I wanted to play Counterstrike and Steam was the best, or maybe the only way to do that. So I broke down and opened a Steam account.
  
  I was a daily CounterStrike 1.6 player back then. I didn't have a choice. Literally couldn't play unless I converted over to a Steam account.
I remember thinking Steam would die in less than 6 months because nobody wanted dematerialised games…
- Part of the problem was how poorly steam ran when it was first introduced
  
  yeah at the time you were forced into it. the won servers were shut down and most peoples computers werent good enough to play CS and have this clunky software running in the background at the same time. it worked but alt-tabbing back then was a gong show and you definitely had the performance hit.
  i played CS daily then so the first day was a shit show and I dont think I got much time in that day. mostly just trying to get connected...the servers were overloaded.
  
  I still remember that meme with the Valve gear fucking a guy in the ass. Steam was not well received.
- I remember getting Half Life 2 for free with my graphics card, then realizing that I needed to download a whole ass other program to redeem my code and download the game. I thought it was for sure a scam and some kind of virus they were trying to get me to install. There were lots of "free" things back then that required you to download a virus to redeem.
  Eventually I learned it was legit and downloaded it and got my free copy of HL2, but I was not happy about it.
  Now every time I download a game at 800Mbps, I'm like, "I LOVE STEAM"
  Edit: I just checked when I created my account. 16 years, 10 months ago. I still have a bit to go before I hit that 20 year mark. Apparently I created my account on my mom's birthday? I wonder why I did that instead of doing something with her?
  
  Same thing here. I didn't want another program just to manage my programs. I could do that without Steam. Of course now it's pretty awesome, but it was fairly redundant when it released.
  
  I too got hl2 free my graphics card, it was some kind of special edition that had like better cooling or something. It came in a special case too.
  Unfortunately there was something wrong with it, don't remember what. But I went back to the store and they didn't had a replacement for it.
  But for 50 bucks extra I could get a other, better card. They paid 50 themselves as a customer service thing, very nice that was!
  I ended up flashing the card to unlock it to a higher tier card, never had any problems with it. So it was a truly great experience for me when hl2 launched.
  The good old days.
- I cursed Valve for forcing me to install Steam to play HL2.
- I didn't want it, still don't. I actively avoided any game that required it but seems I gave up on 23 July 2011
  
  Wow, same here. I gave up June 30, 2011.
  
  I pirated almost any game that required it, only ended up signing up in 2018 I don't remember why at the time but I don't think it was to buy games since I didn't buy any until almost a year after creating the account.
- I thought it was great. I got a physical copy of the Orange Box for $20 and didn't care that I had to install Steam to play it. After I had it set up and realized I didn't have to physically go to the store to get games anymore, I like it even more.
Ah man, mine is only 18 years old.
- Did you make your account for Half-Life 2? My account is the same age, and that's the game that introduced me to Steam.
  
  I made an account in January 2005, probably for HL2.
  I initially resisted making an account and I hated Steam back then.
  They've since fixed a lot of things and I now have 250+ games on it.
  I have to admit, Valve is one of the few big game companies that haven't gone to absolute shit.
  Though I dread the day GabeN steps down or sells out...
  Another thing that I didn't agree with back in the day was WoW, paying a subscription to play was a hard no. Still haven't played it, which kinda sucks because I was a big fan of the old Warcraft games and of RPGs in general.
  Voting with my wallet certainly didn't change much for them, although it probably was better for me.
  
  I think so or CS, I'm not sure?
  
  Christmas '04 Orange Box-er here checking in
- 17y 10m for me
- Lol mine too. I guess I wasn’t that early of an adopter.
I remember connecting with WON before steam, nostalgia CS days
wish i could hide badges.... the CS 10 year veteran badge makes it really shameful to play CS... because I never play CS, I just own it.
- I too bought CS:S so I could use the assets in Garry's Mod.
- You have to choose to display them to begin with... You mean they won't let you choose not to afterwards?
  
  I couldn't figure out a way to have Counter-Strike not show that badge
One more year and my Steam account can legally drink and smoke. I'm taking it to Vegas!
- You can start drinking at 18
  
  In America, probably not. It's 21 for all states due to a federal law. If a state has it lower than 21, they get way less funding for Federal high ways, as the bill was aimed to lower drunk driving.
"Only" 12 years here.
- I hit 16 a few months ago.
  
  Orange box homies say whatsup.
  
  Hitting 20 in 5 hours... ;)
  
  I am at 16 as well. I feel so old now lol
- Only 18 here.
  
  Same here. I created my account after getting Half-Life 2 for Christmas. Hard to believe that came out in Nov 2004.
- 15 here.
I only signed up to play hl2 I think before that I used keys and CDs for things like ground zero
- I remember a work friend burnt HL2 on cd for me and the only way to make it work was he also gave me his steam login. and the dude had a ripper username I still remember to this day, even though I havnt seen him in nearly 20 years.
  mrpoo
Incredibly, some of Steam’s early adopter accounts are still actively in use today, a full two decades after their creation.
There are dozens of us!
- I've got about 8 hours, but I also live on the opposite side of the earth +12 hours, so we'll see if it's bound to UTC time 😂
- Probably thousands, if not more!
- At least
  Edit: Mine turns 20 in 5 days
  
  Apparently I've got 6 more days til mine turns 20, as well.
- I finally managed to find my account age. 19 years and one month! Time flies.
  I had a long hiatus, but I still play FPS games regularly. And I can still join a random HL2 deathmatch and pwn :).
Nice. I didn't make a Steam account until it supported Linux back in 2013 or so. So I guess I'll be celebrating 10 years on Steam soon.
Oh man. It is year 20. I think I made my account like 6 days in. I have a 6 digit steam ID.
Took me awhile to look it up, but just saw I’ve had my account since December 31, 2003. I’m just about at 20 years.
- Mine's 15 now, but back in the day I used those bootlegged Steam clients that allowed me to run Garry's Mod for free. Those were the hackey, piratey times of 700MB aXXo DVD rips that took 1 hour to download.
I think I made mine in 2009 for some sweet sweet TF2.
- The orange box was such a good deal
I remember how much everyone hated steam at first. The WON was fine why ruin it with this stupid steam thing?
aw, only 19 for me!
- Mine was 19 years, but I was military and got sent overseas for a few years. When I came back, I hadn't actually logged in for the entire time and my account had been reset.
Before steamid there was wonid. OGs know.
- I for some reason take great pride in having a low numbered steamid.
  
  I robbed my self of that ability accidentally, because I preferred cs 1.3/4/5 and it was won only, so I actively avoided 1.6 like the plague and with it steam. Then halflife 2 came out and I bit the bullet.
  
  yeah i signed up the same day wonid switched to steamid and nabbed a 5 digit
My account is @hotmail.com. I'm not sure I'm in this wave, but it must be a few weeks till I hit it.
- Mine is @yahoo, really wish I could change it.
  
  If you still have access to the original email address you can definitely change it.
- Mines a domain I used to have thinking I was cool. I was not...
  @irtehwin.com
- Mine too, I hit 20 years this week 🥳
- Mine is still a @yahoo login but I wont hit 20 years until February.
11/22/2004 reporting in. Just currently 18 almost 19. I do not have a short steam ID though. Can’t remember which game was the first but pretty sure it was either half-life or HL2
Member since 24 July 2004 here. Doesn't feel like 20 years, but it's also hard to imagine having ~5Tb of installed games across multiple launchers just... available. Plus emulators and other resources. Steam was a pain in the arse at first, but they made it work, and they saw beyond the limitations of dialup tech. I was all for it at the time because I had one of the few Coax connections (NTL at the time, later taken over by Virgin Media) which at that point I believe was 10Mbit... Of course, nowadays we have Gigabit FTTP rolling out throughout the UK, so this seems really quaint, but it's pleasing to see how far we've come.
The US coverage still sucks. Sort your shit out guys, you're 20 years behind the UK, and we're a good 10 behind Norway, Hong Kong and others thanks to Twatcher.
- I'm always shocked at how behind the US is in some areas of tech despite having so many of the big tech companies located there. Like you say their internet coverage and terms of packages, like still having data limits in 2023. Also the fact that they still sign for card payments in shops, when we've been though both chip and pin and contactless since that method was common.
  
  Yeah - I don't even cary cards with me any more, it's all on my phone. Including many store cards (Coop, Texaco, Shell, McDonalds...) which automatically pick up without me doing much - I scan, it works.
  The only thing I can think is that the US is such a fractured environment with Federal, State and Local government, each with different jurisdictions, rules and taxation, that trying to get it to work would be beurocratically difficult. But at the same time, it's so ruled by corporations that surely they'd want to push the easiest way - flip your phone out and wave it to pay, easy and secure, so make it happen :D
I'm like 3120 or something to sign up. That day was a complete mess as everyone signing up and trying to download their games DDoSed the platform. At that time Steam was just a client to download and play Valve games.
I was younger then and had my own domain thinking I was cool but it is actually shit and uses leet speak. I'm stuck with that forever now as my account name. Sigh.
Damn, 16 here
18 as well.
Mine is 18, do I get a cookie?
- 🥠Here you go! :P Look, you're two off, be glad you got anything 😅
  Wait, mine's 19 and I didn't even get that D: WE DEMAND SNACKS! ✊
- Up here, you can drink alcohol at 18 y.o.
I'm primarily a console peasant, but my Steam account goes back to 2007. I don't remember the specifics, but I know I opened it after getting a physical copy of The Ship from Target. Never played it much, though.
Still have 5 more years to go for my 20th.
Still makes me feel old though.
Damn, getting old. 19 years of service, hitting 20 at the start of February. 😄
I'm just here to remind people that those guys are active shills that sold out immediately back when all of us principled ones were raging about them forcing always online DRM onto Half Life 2 and actively boycotting it (and still playing a cracked copy anyway, because hey).
And you know what? We were right. Turns out it DID make everything a nightmarish hellscape of big brother-esque remote digital rights control where you never own anything you buy. Those 20 year old veterans ruined it all.
So yeah, they get a badge and I get to go "you maniacs, you blew it up!" and so on.
- Really? I was against Steam when it came out, it felt like insanity: I have to create an account, then register my CD key and it's gone!? How will I be able to share this game with my friends?!
  But after a while it's straight up better. Do you still remember SecuROM (which shut off its servers, so you can't even get games with it to run nowadays)? Or having to go to the developer's website to manually download update 1.0.1a to 1.0.1b to 1.1 to 1.1.2 to 1.3a to 1.4 to ... (if you were lucky they offered bigger patches where you could directly jump from 1.0.1a to 1.4 or something). And then years later the developer was bought up or shut down, so the patches were no longer available.
  Don't even remind me of having to stand up, go over to my pile of games, find the right box, open it up, grab the CD, go back to the PC, put the CD in, then start the game I want (hopefully the CD wasn't scratched). Nowadays I don't even have a CD drive anymore and I currently have ~70 games installed that I can start in a second or two.
  I grew up with sharing CDs (and keys) with friends, or putting a CD into one computer, boot the game, put the CD in a second computer, boot the game, then play on LAN. Steam is way better still. If you don't like it, buy from GOG.
  
  I do buy from GOG. It's my primary online store. I only go to the others when something isn't available there. Which is most of the time, because we live in the lamest dystopia.
  For what it's worth, fanboys are gonna fanboy, but I have no need to deny Steam's conveniences to call them out on the anti-property DRM crap. Absolutely piecemeal DRM is worse. Not that Steam made it disappear, I had a game install Denuvo on me over Steam just this week.
  Absolutely digitally purchasing games is better than digging up optical media for DRM checks. Absolutely it's better to have worldwide digital launches where you just... get the game the second it launches instead of running around after it like a crazy person.
  But we do live in a DRM dystopia where we own nothing and are supposed to like it, the tens of thousands of dollars dumped into my Steam account will go away the moment a Steam moderator decides they don't like me and they will certainly evaporate after I'm gone, and many, many games are now lost media like we just started making TV but haven't invented video tapes yet.
  All those things get to be true at the same time. I was kinda joking with my original post just to remind people that Steam was far from controversial and beloved at launch, but since we're talking about it... yeah, hell yeah, we gave up on basic ownership for the sake of convenience and Steam was absolutely part of that process.
  "God damn you all to hell" indeed.
- I don't inherently disagree with what you're saying, but online DRM would have happened anyway sooner or later, and online isn't always online.
  But most importantly, I'd rather a billion times have Valve rolling in that Steam money than any other publisher on the videogame market: the industry would be just that much worse, with unexisting indie devs and no Proton.
  
  I mean... would it? Indie devs not only existed before Steam, but typically have a hugely contentions relationship with them. I haven't forgotten all the growing pains about races to the bottom through sales, arguments about curation and the entire Greenlight fiasco.
  I'd give them credit for pushing indie devs enough to get Nintendo to stop being annoying to work with, but that was Microsoft pushing Sony which in turn pushed Nintendo. Steam is background noise in that process.
  Valve solved the issue of PC piracy in the way Netflix solved the issue of TV and movie piracy: by creating a convenient service people liked to use that is significantly more hassle free than digging through shady websites. If they hadn't figured it out, the next-in-line big store that happened was GOG, which is coincidentally a DRM-free storefront that grew as a reaction to Steam. I don't know what the CD Projekt Deck would have looked like, but we at least would have gotten a third sequel of a game series, so there's that.
- Everyone saw the current landscape coming, and there was no way around it if we wanted online distribution. I hate DRM as much as the next guy, and love my physical collection, but it wasn't Valve and Steam that ushered in this BS. You can avoid steam, and a large amount of DRM if you genuinely care about. There was pushback years later and even Apple allowed you to DRM-less options.
  After years of MPAA and RIAA BS piracy claims from cd & dvd ripping and declining physical sales, every company and their mom was looking into DRM to allay the fears of copyright holders and enable digital distribution. It was going to happen regardless of Steam. Apple, Microsoft, Sony, Philips, etc were all launching the same shit. Apple launched the iTunes store months before with complete DRM and people ate that up. Companies new years before people would adopt it if the benefits of digital distribution outweighed the inconvenience, and they were right.
  Shit like Denuvo was going to happen regardless, as despite the push back on some of the invasive DRM, some companies remain unconvinced. They do it even on top of Steam.
  
  No, wait, it literally WAS Steam. I mean, it wasn't just Steam, but those guys were there at ground level. Valve is ultimately an offshoot of Microsoft, it's not like becoming the main app store on home PCs by introducing structured DRM, sales and download management software wasn't part of their plan.
  So let's be clear about what we're talking about here. Denuvo? Yep, that sort of DRM predates Steam. License limits and online activation? That's contemporary to Steam and it's the problem Steam is trying to solve. Online app stores built around DRM? Steam is as early on that race as it gets, and it's absolutely built for that purpose.
  I like it as a piece of software, too, it's well made, but why whitewash it?
  Plus, I have to point out that you seem to be arguing two opposite things at once. Is DRM inevitable? Well, since you seem to be correctly arguing that DRM-free alternatives do exist and seem to be financially viable... I'm gonna say no?
- You might disagree with the Steam DRM wrapper in principle, but in practice it's laughably easy to bypass (by design). The difference between a DRM-free game and a game solely running Steam DRM is five minutes of effort, at that point does DRM even matter?
  The Steam DRM wrapper is an important part of Steam platform because it verifies game ownership and ensures that Steamworks features work properly by launching Steam before launching the game.
  The Steam DRM wrapper by itself is not an anti-piracy solution. The Steam DRM wrapper protects against extremely casual piracy (i.e. copying all game files to another computer) and has some obfuscation, but it is easily removed by a motivated attacker.
  We suggest enhancing the value of legitimate copies of your game by using Steamworks features which won't work on non-legitimate copies (e.g. online multiplayer, achievements, leaderboards, trading cards, etc.).
  
  It matters because it's there. If it was meant to not be DRM it... wouldn't be DRM. That copy is very much designed to justify the fact that Steam allows games to publish with double or even triple DRM solutions under the Steam platform.
  In practice, the DRM matters because it discourages keeping a backup of fully owned game files. On GOG it's trivial to backup offline installers, which are provided explicitly (and I do keep a backup of games I only own on GOG, by the way). Steam explicitly limits your access to your games and how you use them, presumably to support a secure microtransaction environment within the Steam platform. That'd be the "ensures the Steamworks features work" bit in that text.
  That's extremely nontrivial for Steam, for the record. Disputing the ability to drive separate MTX under Steam is why several major publishers ended up withdrawing for a bit until they realized it's not commercially viable and Steam is effectively a quasi-monopoly on the PC platform.
- Eh, I joined knowing full well that I was trading permanent ownership and the risk of losing access if steam failed for the convenience of installing and updating without needing to do every game separately. I wasn't in the habit of trading in games anyway, and if I get an average amount of enjoyment across games then that works out whether I uninstall from steam or throw a box in the trash.
  After using it for two decades steam is still the best decision I have made for gaming even of there is still a risk that they could go belly up or remove my games at will with no recourse. The few games I lost access to were online multi-player where the servers shut down, and physicsl media would not have avoided that. On the upside many games that would have lost support over time have always been available to install and run without needing to store physical media, and a combination of sales for lowered prices and a game just being available have made the platform my reliable go to.
  Competitors like GoG that offer DRM free versions are another great avenue for people! I even have a couple of games from then, but convenience and consistent reliability has been the reason that I load a game in steam nearly every day even if just for a quick round. Basically the opposite of a hellscape in my experience, but then again I have had mostly reliable internet during that time.
  On a side note, I have no idea what steam levels are or whar any of the steam perks stuff is. I just use it for launching games.
  
  Cool. I don't disagree with any of that, for the record.
  It's the defensiveness and outright denialism of the tradeoffs that I'm calling out, if anything.
- Here's your 🍪
- I don't see a situation where digital distribution of games would have led to a space where games having no DRM would have been mainstream. Even with DRM companies continue to associate PC with piracy.
  There was also the whole Sony rootkit after all with music CDs, so I'm just not seeing this whole argument of this space could have been different if it weren't for valve. Not even sure PC gaming would have been as big as it is now if it weren't for Valve and it really would have been a situation of PC gaming being dead and for niche titles as opposed to just some clickbait headline.
  
  But those things can be true at the same time. Yes, PC gaming was in a rough spot before Steam solved DRM and digital distribution. Absolutely physical PC games were struggling with no alternative and Microsoft sure wasn't figuring that out.
  But Steam's success was to transition PC gaming to an all-DRM-all-the-time quasi monopoly built around removing PC game ownership from the table altogether.
  I'm just as fine with both of those statements. In the real world things rarely are complete positives or negatives, despite our cultural need to take sides on stuff. This entire thread started with a tongue-in-cheek joke about how controversial Steam was at launch, which is an undeniable fact. People get weirdly defensive about it, though.
  The biggest difference between Steam and others is that people tend to recognize Apple's weirdness about the App Store or the downsides of Spotify or Netflix, all of which pulled off similar moves. Steam, though, still manages to present itself as a bit of a plucky upstart that is with you on this thing against the big bad publishers, which is kind of nuts.
- At least it's digital rights control now instead of your rights depending on a fragile piece of plastic and aluminum.
  What good is legally owning a game if I lose access to it just because it physically broke? I'd still have to buy it again (or pirate it) if anything happened to the disk, so IMO, it's a wash.
  We give up legal rights in exchange for extra short term safety and convenience. And if Steam or the developer ever takes it away from me, I can always just go pirate it to get it back.
  
  If I punched you in the dick, would you say, "At least you didn't kick me in the dick (with shoes!)"?
  What good is legally "owning" a game if you can never sell it, and what good is games never breaking if you can't buy and run them from a yard sale for a quarter?

153 comments