‘Gaza Drives Political Choices’ – Stein Ahead in Three Critical States
‘Gaza Drives Political Choices’ – Stein Ahead in Three Critical States
www.palestinechronicle.com
‘Gaza Drives Political Choices’ - Stein Ahead in Three Critical States
36 comments
-
-
...among Muslim voters
-
Yes. But I didn't write the headline. I think it's a misleading headline, but we aren't allowed to change when we post.
So if mods decide to delete article due to the editorial choice that the news org made, I am fine with that decision.
-
I think it's a misleading headline, but we aren't allowed to change when we post.
Incorrect.
Rule 1 from the sidebar(emphasis, mine):
Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive
-
I never thought I'd be quoting the rules to you, but...
Rules: 1. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive.
My reading of this is that it's optional to add additional context or to be more descriptive so this post should be okay. But you have the option to update the title for those purposes.
-
-
-
She’s lost any credibility after that radio interview.
-
The interview didn't make me change my mind about her.
-
-
It really doesn't.
People can think it's awful at the same time they can't do anything about it because IT'S NOT WITHIN US CONTROL.
-
We could stop sending them weapons. Then we could stop sending them financial aid. Then we could sanction them. Its pretty entirely in US control, Israels existence always has been
-
36 comments
OP has shown their intentions are vengeance against Dems for perceived slights. Keep this agenda in mind if you read their BS articles.
Regardless of his intentions, it's very aggravating how many of his clearly combative comments stay up despite "no trolling" being in rule 4.
I frankly do not understand why we have the rule if it is never going to be enforced. Is there question among our mod team about what constitutes trolling?
Looking through the modlog though, the only rule 4 enforcement seems to be low-effort stuff. High-effort trolling appears to be completely welcome in this community, which I just do not understand. But I'm contemplating beginning to take advantage of it. I can piss people off with subtle, passive-aggressive personal digs and logical fallacies while maintaining a veneer of civility too. It's been a lot of years, but I'm sure it'll come right back to me.
The only thing that really bothers me is that they put zero effort into rationally justifying their opinions. "Muh, my opinion, no matter how irrational and unfounded, is just as valid as yours!". That kind of dishonest deflection is trolling but I abhor dragging mods into it unless it is necessary. I can deal with trolling.
I cant believe OP is supporting a different party because he doesnt like yours. What a troll
Yep, thanks to you, I guess maybe Harris has just lost another vote.
I was on the fence because of all the thoughtful courteous replies I was getting, but now...
Guess ya should have been nicer. Oh well. :)
Lol, there's no way in hell your decision on how to vote was ever going to be swayed by the civility of Lemmy comments
I encourage you to vote for whomever you see fit. Write in Frank Zappa.