Alabama Failed to Carry Out Its Last Two Executions. It’s Trying Again This Week.
Alabama Failed to Carry Out Its Last Two Executions. It’s Trying Again This Week.
A string of long and bloody lethal injections last year led to a brief moratorium. But an internal review from prison officials remains shrouded in secrecy, and advocates warn new protocols may increase the risk of torturous executions.
I think execution is just wrong. I think many of the people who are executed have done wretched things but surely we don't have the right to kill them.
Even if our justice system was perfect and only convicted the people who actually did the crime... I would still be against the death penalty. But here in the real world we frequently murder innocent people and we, as a collective, have their blood on our hands.
You're absolutely right. (Cops are especially guilty).
If they attempted and fail, the death sentencw should be commuted because surely it is a miraculous sign from God that the person is innocent.
Trial by Ordeal
I used to be a proponent of the death penalty. Someone shoots up a school or is a serial rapist, they forfeit their right to live and are beyond rehabilitation
But the book "The Chamber" by John Grisham completely changed my mind. One of the only books to ever make me cry, I realized what an awful responsibility the state has when deciding what to do with the worst of the worst. It's so easy to lean into retribution but I decided that day I don't want to support legally sanctioned murder. I'd rather my tax dollars go into keeping prisoners alive than for them to be spent on taking lives for no other reason than blood lust.
Then of course you start digging into all the problems with criminal justice; innocent prisoners, corruption, racism... it's wildly irresponsible to trust any justice system to be so infallible as to decide who lives and dies.
If we believe in the death penalty, then we believe that the state has a right to end someone's life because they unjustly took someone else's.
So if a person was executed and was found posthumously to actually have been innocent, then would we be justified in executing, say, the DA who prosecuted the crime?
Yeah we totally would, and if the original murderer was found to not be innocent we would have to kill the person who killed the person who killed the murderer…
And perhaps at that point, enough people might realize that giving the state the right to execute people is extremely fraught and finally decide it's not worth it.
But it seems like maybe the bloodlust is too strong.
Do we ever give the death penalty to someone who kills someone by accident or in an unfortunate situation?
You analogy might be relevant if the DA knew the person was innocent and intentionally framed them and/or continued to prosecute. But it's not remotely the same to have done so and been mistaken.
Do we ever give the death penalty to someone who kills someone by accident or in an unfortunate situation?
No, but we sometimes give the death penalty to... people who didn't do anything wrong? And maybe, just maybe, it's too easy, too consequence-free, for the state to take someone's life, if it just happens by accident sometimes.
Well... That is terrifying.
"Lol, u shoulda seen ur face when u thought we were gonna do it."
They won't do nitrogen because there is no protocol despite being legal for five years. But clearly the protocol for lethal injection is shit. So instead of using that would almost certainly be painless they will do something that has caused many painful deaths over the years simply because they've done it before.
How hard can it be
It's very easy. A room full of nitrogen gas does it painlessly. But people suck ass and don't want a painless, easy execution. They want hangings, injections that cause incredible pain, electrocution, etc.
What's wrong with a firing squad?
The state having the power of life and death over its citizenry is what's wrong.
That's an opinion about the death penalty in general. Fact is the state does have that power, so when faced with difficulty carrying out execution, why not the firing squad?
Historically the guys using firing squads have not generally been the good guys.
You could say the same thing about guys who use capital punishment, like Saudi Arabia, Iraq and America.
It's considered unreliable and inhumane, I think. Yes, I am aware that apparently the current methods are also not reliable.
Personally, I'm against executions on principle, but if we are to have executions, I think I'd prefer mine to be by firing squad first, guillotine second. I would not like to have a lethal injection or electric chair.