Geofucking something means they just gave you the moral right to 🏴‍☠️ You wanted to do the "right" thing, they didn't want your money. 🤷‍♀️

There was the same post a week ago, which specified it to be USA exclusive

I did not try it, but theoretically, a VPN should work

Equal parts timeless social commentary, fantasy, and comedy. Not too grim, not too saccharine—always juggling the big existential questions, highjinks, and word-play it'll take multiple re-reads to catch. The personification of Death is a cat lady skeleton.

It's a special experience. Others have gone over the broad strokes, so I'll instead describe my two favourite characters in the entirety of fiction.

Sam Vimes is a pragmatic, down to earth everyman. In a world full of crime, racism, magic, and political shenanigans, he tries (and mostly succeeds) to be true to his beliefs and convictions. Convictions like female dwarves deserve to identify as female if they want to, no matter how much dwarven society despises any dwarf not sticking to male identities. That anyone and everyone deserves to be hired and promoted on merit, no matter the stigma around ghouls, zombies and werewolves. He cares about his people and his city, and really tries. He may not fully understand your culture or religion, but he will defend your right to it to the death.

Rincewind is the opposite of the hero archetype. He's the coward with a thousand backs. A failed wizard, because the immensely powerful spell living in his head scares off all the other spells, all he wants is to live a nice, calm, peaceful life. Against his will, he's dragged from adventure to adventure and runs away from every exciting and mystical thing in the world. He's seen everything, done everything, and never wanted to step out of the Unseen University.

It's fantasy comedy. It is to fantasy novels what Spaceballs is to Star Wars.

I personally love the city watch books the most, which starts with Guards! Guards! and circle around themes of justice and social inequality in a way that will be satisfying if you are working class left of center. There's a sort of a timeline, but I read them wildly out of order and didn't feel the worse off for it. Pratchett really found his voice after writing a few books, so I think it's generally suggested not to start at the beginning. Each 'series' has a core motif it pokes at, but if you were only to read one to see if you liked the style... I think Going Postal?

I started with Small Gods. Which is a standalone story that takes place early chronologically. After reading that as a test to see how well I would like it. I then went to the beginning in publishing order.

Part of what makes the books brilliant is that, while there is connectivity between some of them, they are all self contained. Pratchett managed to do this without being repetitive or assuming that the reader has read all the books before the one being read. There are times when characters refer to previous books but it never happens in a way that makes you feel like you are missing something. It is useful to read the different series in order but not necessary.

Thanks for all the replies everyone!

It's non-linear to me but if something is mentioned in the book that happened in the past, I just read that book in the frame of being a prequel. It hasn't really turned into anything spoiler heavy. Though the City Watch novels are a lot more linear and tend to see a lot of character growth.