“Do not hallucinate”: Testers find prompts meant to keep Apple Intelligence on the rails
“Do not hallucinate”: Testers find prompts meant to keep Apple Intelligence on the rails
arstechnica.com
“Do not hallucinate”: Testers find prompts meant to keep Apple Intelligence on the rails
Long lists of instructions show how Apple is trying to navigate AI pitfalls.
You can't tell an LLM to not hallucinate, that would require it to actually understand what it's saying. "Hallucinations" are just LLMs bullshitting, because that's what they do. LLMs aren't actually intelligent they're just using statistics to remix existing sentences.
I wish people would say machine learning or LLMs more frequently instead of AI being the buzzword. It really irks me. IT'S NOT ACCURATE! THAT'S NOT WHAT IT IS! STOP DEMEANING TRUE MACHINE CONSCIOUSNESS!
Gotta let the people know they're getting scammed with false advertising
Are there any practical examples of applied AI these days? Like, used in robotics or computer applications?
No, it simply requires the probability distributions to be positively influenced by the additional characters. Whether it's positive or not is reliant only on the training data.
There are a bunch of techniques that can improve LLM outputs, even though they don't make sense from your standpoint. An LLM can't feel anything, yet the output can improve when I threaten it with consequences for wrong output. If you were correct, this wouldn't be possible.
I'd love to see a source on that.