New rulings on presidential immunity, workers’ rights, and Chevron deference make it clear: we can have social progress or we can have a powerful Supreme Court, but we can’t have both.
We don't have a true democracy and never have. If we did, Trump and Bush II would never have become president as neither received as many votes as their opponents.
Second, any speculative changes on a macro level require either violence on a revolutionary scale or for 49% of voters to pull the lever for a third party instead of Democrats or Republicans.
I think it's more likely WWIII will disrupt America's politics before we have another revolution, and I know full well that our partisans are too well-programmed to pull the lever for anyone other than Democrats and Republicans, so I don't anticipate any meaningful positive change in the near future.
I'm not sure that the electoral college precludes qualifying as a democracy. Voter disenfranchisement certainly seems to put a wrench in the idea though.
Problem is that any ongoing cases would need to be stopped too. That's actually a good thing for Trump because he can reset the timer on all of his cases