Skip Navigation
Fediverse @lemmy.world pewgar_seemsimandroid @lemmy.blahaj.zone

Fork it! It's time for a Mastodon hard fork

privacy.thenexus.today /mastodon-hard-fork-2
 Embed prevented alt text

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/11571975

Fork it! It's time for a Mastodon hard fork

50

You're viewing a single thread.

50 comments

  • I say DON'T fork it. Heres the thing nobody in communities wants to come to grips with.......security is not the way to grow a very new platform. "Normie" users will not give one shit if you are super secured with 87 point encrypted authentication. Super secure? Don't mean shit.

    You know what normie users DO care about? Marketing. They want one concise marketing vision. They want one baseball brand. One football brand. One basketball brand. One twitter. One facebook. One instagram.

    Now. There are times that those dominant platforms can be disrupted. If oh.....I don't know.......some dipshit decided to spend 44 BILLION dollars and spend the next 2 years changing it from the dominant name in microblogging, to a right wing facist supporting echochamber where differing ideas are stiffled, blocked, and shut down.

    That would create the need for a secondary dominant microblogging platform that allows for freedom of ideas to be posted and not deleted due to political stance.

    Enter Mastadon. It fills that void nicely. It's still small as the majority of the userbase of twitter has no idea Mastodon exists. However it's undeniable they are losing massive numbers of users. Not because they don't like the twitter concept, but because they don't like what it's become.

    With more marketing, mastodon COULD be the new dominant twitter, thus rendering that 44Billion dollar purchase even MORE stupid than it already is, if 90% of their userbase leaves.

    But where you'll lose them is if they have to make a choice. Mastodon 1 and Mastodon 2??? Well twitter was just twitter......this must not be twitter.

    And just like that, you've confused and lost the new user. Forget the fediverse. Forget instances. Forget security. Forget federation. The normie user doesn't know and doesn't care about ANY of that. Instead just say "its one mastodon. It's like twitter without facism"

    Boom! User influx. This is already happening in spite of lack of marketing and the fediverse existing. Thats how badly people want a twitter clone. If someone else makes another non-fediverse clone, with no facism, and big money marketing, mastodon won't grow to its full potential.

    But for gods sakes! Don't shoot yourself in the foot to spite yourself.

    • They want one baseball brand. One football brand. One basketball brand. One twitter. One facebook. One instagram.

      Why's everything need to be so complicated, anyway? Can't we just have on sportsballgame and one twitgramface?

      • Ironically, the thing that would allow people to use one "twitgramface" account across all the various platforms is federation. But the only way I can imagine it being seamless enough for normies is native browser integration for ActivityPub, perhaps with a new URL scheme like apub://.... Basically, save a Fediverse account in your browser, and when you open a foreign-instance link someone sends you, you'll see a prompt:

        How do you want to open this link (apub:)?

        You can browse this content via your instance and interact with it with one of your saved Fediverse accounts, or choose an app you have installed:

        @yourusernamehere@lemmy.one    ︿
        @example@fedia.io
        @user123@mastodon.social
        Voyager (vger.app Web App)
        Tootle (Local App)

        ☐ Remember my choice for feddit.nl
        ☐ Remember my choice across all instances

        Accept Reject

        ⓘ Why am I seeing this?    ︿

        This content is on feddit.nl, which is an ActivityPub instance that 3 of your saved Fediverse accounts federate with. To use your account, open this link via your instance, or select Decline to use feddit.nl's default web interface.

        So far, only browser extensions can do this, and not very well at that. Of course, all ActivityPub instances and clients would need to adopt this URL scheme whenever a link is shared between users, and the downside is that Reddit, Instagram, Twitter etc. will never recognize apub: links. Do you think something like this can ever happen?

      • And you will notice that in the vast majority of the world, the joke about the ball game happens/happened. America is very american football centric. Germany is all about football. England has cricket. Etc, etc.

        You jest, but yes, since our lives are complicated enough as is, we want our hobbies to be as straightforward and easy to communicate/communalize as possible.

    • Don't people today still choose between Gmail and Outlook?

You've viewed 50 comments.