You're viewing a single thread.
The absolute beauty of this: readers adding context without denying the actual content of the message. Glorious.
128 2 ReplyRemember in grammar school when your teacher told you that Wikipedia is not a valid source? I'm sure they're saying the same thing about AI right now.
20 3 ReplyThe difference being that on wikipedia you could use the sources on there while AI makes those up as well
33 0 ReplyA more important reason is teachers let you use Wikipedia sources, while even valid ai content is “not your work”
7 1 ReplyWell, we do have AI that cites sources now, but it's still not completely accurate.
3 3 ReplyI remember an AI that wrote a legal motion and justified its arguments by citing cases it made up.
16 0 ReplyI mean, of course. For the record, that wasn't the type that cites its sources intrinsically as part of its response creation process, although it wouldn't be immune to hallucinations even if it was.
4 3 Reply
Yeah, and I have to practice mental arithmetic because I won't always have a calculator in my pocket.
8 0 ReplyI mean if all the screenshots people take with their battery in the corner at 1% is any indication, you won’t always have one lol
11 0 ReplyLearn how to do math in your head for the sheer pleasure of it, instead!
8 0 Reply