Bulletins and News Discussion for December 11th to December 17th, 2023 - What's Yours is Mine - COTW: Canada
Image is of the Cobre Panama open-pit copper mine, located 120 kilometers west of Panama City.
Canada is a prolific mining country, hosting many of the world's top mining corporations. Some of its extraction is local - for example, Saskatchewan is the world's largest producer of potash, a critical agricultural nutrient. Much of the extraction is abroad. Naturally, this means that Canada has cut a bloody, but often ignored, path through the global periphery, extracting minerals and causing environmental degradation.
A notable recent example is that of the Cobre Panama copper mine, which is owned by First Quantum Minerals, one of the largest mining companies in Canada. The company earned $10 billion in revenue in 2022, of which the Cobre Panama mine generated $1 billion. Protests in Panama about this mine have gone on for over a decade, urging for a greater share of the profits, protection of indigenous people, and stronger environmental protections. Canada has maintained a stoney silence (pun somewhat intended) on these movements.
On October 20th, the president of Panama, Cortizo, renewed the company's mining concession for 20 years, after a halt in production since the end of 2022 due to negotiations and reform. Everybody hated this. In October, protestors took to the streets in sufficient numbers that Cortizo was forced to halt new mining approvals, and announced a public referendum on whether the contract with First Quantum should be repealed. This was immediately cut down, but the government decided to invalidate the new concession anyway in late November, calling it unconstitutional, and closing down the mine.
First Quantum Minerals has lost about half its market value since October. Various international banks have said that Panama could lose its investment-grade credit rating next year due to the income hit - the mine generated 5% of its GDP. The international arbitration process which First Quantum has initiated against Panama could last years.
The book Canada in the World: Settler Capitalism and the Colonial Imagination handles Canada's role as an imperialist, anti-indigenous, extractive state throughout its history, and is on our geopolitical reading list.
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section. Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war. Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language. https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one. https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts. https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel. https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator. https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps. https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language. https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language. https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses. https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
It's wild how the narrative has shifted. I dunno if it's just my echo chamber but I swear, it's becoming more and more acceptable to outright support Hamas, which was completely unthinkable 2 months ago. The comments under that video are overwhelmingly supportive. Israel is being so overwhelmingly brutal and cruel that they somehow managed to blow a "1400 civilians* dead" head start, not only that, they're losing the PR war while having the entire Western propaganda apparatus working for them.
Just think about that. Imagine being so blatantly, horrifically brutal and unhinged that libs are slowly starting to think "Hm, maybe these spooky scary muslims have a point? Even though they yell allahu akbar (scary!) and even though biden tells me they're bad?"
In the first days I and other users had to fight over here to make sure people understood that Hamas isn't what they thought it was at first, a lot of users thought they were like ISIS but only accepted them because they're currently fighting something much worse, and some users even suggested that Fateh is better because they're "secular". I knew Hamas isn't like that because I have a few Gazan friends who lived under Hamas and know how they act, and me being from the region I can tell how extremist a group is by their vibe, but now I don't even have to argue about Hamas anymore.
I've noticed that even the more conservative people that I have regular interactions with are getting a little antsy about it.
Like, the problem that Israel has is that they want two, contradictory things: they want to make the October 7th attacks look like horrific terrorist unjustifiable mass atrocities, but also don't want to appear weak in the face of those same "terrorists", and so don't want to highlight their massive L. They tried to do this by saying that actually all the people killed were civilians and all the places Hamas went were peaceful villages where they gunned down innocent people and took them hostage, but that narrative just wasn't really able to hold together for too long in the face of other evidence. It doesn't make sense if you think about it for more than a few seconds, and there's like, actual videos released by Hamas of them entering barracks and killing soldiers and shit. I've seen a few of them, they are undeniably soldiers.
If this had happened, say, 20 years ago when social media wasn't such a prevalent thing, then I think public opinion would be much more in favour of Israel, because the Gazans wouldn't have been able to communicate as well with the outside world, and everything would have come from journalists and maybe the odd leak from a whistleblower. But now that there's hundreds and hundreds of videos taken inside Gaza of men, women, children, and actual fucking babies being killed in indiscriminate airstrikes and being shot at and executed, anybody who's paying even slight attention to the conflict is just inundated with a stream of awful videos showing that Israel is very obviously committing genocidal war crimes, and so as long as you aren't approaching this already from the perspective of "Palestinians are worthless subhumans who are lower than bacteria" like a few well-known Zionist figures seem to think, and have even the slightest sympathy towards your fellow man, then by like week 12 of watching non-stop airstrikes and war crimes and atrocities, you start to be like "...uhh... maybe Israel should... chill out a little?"
And because Israel is so loathe to post even the vaguest L, to the point of saying that there's been like 3 fucking deaths and 5 vehicles destroyed in 2-3 months when it's literally like 2-3 orders of magnitude higher if combining all fronts, then it just comes across as this totally heartless enemy doing this shit for no reason. Honestly, if Israel was even a little more honest with its numbers, then I wonder if sympathy would start increasing a little. If they said that, idk, 500 or 700 or 1000 soldiers had been killed so far like they have, then people might be able to point at that and go "See! Hamas does deserve to be destroyed and the civilian casualties are worth it, look at the lovely professional soldiers being killed by them!"
I think it is really important to tell people about the drop in causalities in November where an israeli official admitted that they counted 200 Hamas in the initial reports because they were badly burned and mixed in with the settlers. Also the IDF air force admitted to shooting anything that moved and strafing the parking lot at the rave. There is testimony of a tank commander and Yasmin Porat that the IDF fired artilery and tank shells into israeli homes where hostages were kept. Finaly in the revised 1200 deaths 400 were police and military.
I have no doubts that 90% of the civilians killed in the october breakout were killed by the IDF. We need to shift the narrative from justifying the civilian deaths by Hamas to "Hamas did nothing wrong."
The issue is most of those sources are in Hebrew or in the Electronic Intifada. I know some people will ignore the latter since Wikipedia doesn't allow it. They got it banned this year iirc. Probably due to Palestine but idk for sure