Donald Trump tried to clean up the mess after his widely criticized visit to Arlington National Cemetery, where two of his staffers allegedly engaged in an altercation with an official trying to enforce rules against photographing gravesites.
The former president and Republican nominee posed for.....
It wasn't "possibly illegal", it was just plainly illegal.
I agree with most of its other ratings though. TBF I never thought to check their rating for RawStory, but the only other rating I disagree with is their rating for Fox News.
It depends. I haven't seen those stories. There's a massive gamut of anti-zionists, from reasonable skepticism and criticism of Israel and its actions to full-on antisemitism. I have seen someone else here state that one organization got bad marks for claiming that Israel is engaging in a genocide, which is completely fair since that hasn't been proven.
I don't disagree on the whole. But I think that putting 'trust' in any bot would be silly. However, knowing how right-skewed the bot is and using its blurb as a single data point with that in mind, is better (to me) than just not having it at all.
MB/FC is extremely biased and mostly reflects a single American "centrist" (really a right winger because America has two right wing parties)'s assessment of media. Largely MB/FC stands to normalize right leaning media coverage. This is particularly problematic when looking at topics like the Gaza Strip
If one is going to look at politics through a "the center doesn't exist" lens, that's not functionally better than if MB/FC was biased in favor of the left.
Yeah that's true, I've seen international liberal spout rhetoric I'd normally associate with centrists.
But trying to map international overton windows with America's doesn't always work. Left wing and right wing liberal parties in the UK for example don't map perfectly with the purported values of the Democrat and Republican parties in America.