yetAnotherUser @ yetAnotherUser @discuss.tchncs.de

Hi!

---

Read more

Posts

4

Comments

1,116

Joined

1 yr. ago

How does that even make sense?

Wouldn't you lower the sentence if the victim AI says it forgives the killer? Because - you know - it significantly reduces the "revenge" angle the American justice system is based on?

I'd prefer not going to university and rather spend all my time having fun. But as an adult, I can more easily rationalize why I should spend my time doing the former. Children do not yet have this ability - I certainly didn't and would probably not have attended school much if my parents didn't care. Phones were banned at my school and definitely forced me to pay attention as learning is usually significantly more entertaining/rewarding than fruitlessly trying to distract yourself by staring at the clock.

I disagree to some extent with the claim total war is integral to fascism.

It was integral to nazism under Hitler and maybe Mussolini's fascism (though I don't know enough about the latter). But Franco very much did not require total war to be fascist. None of his wars were total wars as all of them were rather small and not particularly noteworthy. Even the civil war wasn't a total war, despite its significant death toll.

Fascism is very much hungry for wars. But there's a bit of a "natural selection" going on where the Hitler-like total war fanatics usually last a couple of years at most while the more restrictive fascists can remain in power for many decades at least. You can see the latter with Franco's Spain or Putin's Russia.

The only good thing about fascism is once the dictator dies there's a significant risk of collapse.

The comment - which isn't edited - uses (c).

Whatever client you use replaces/renders (c) [bracket c bracket] as ©.

Do you compromise by having bi sex if they preferred straight sex one night?

Why would color blind people struggle with this sign? There are no similar looking signs which mean something different.

The closest one would be this one:

And any color blind person is able to distinguish those two easily.

I see how it can be confusing for someone not used to it but for anyone who grew up in a country where this is the default it is perfectly understandable.

Nope:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibitory_traffic_sign

Many countries use red circle + symbol to depict who is not permitted to drive there.

Why would you need curbs to be marked?

Over here in Germany parking 5 meters in front of crosswalks is illegal. No curb is ever striped, anywhere. If you are unsure whether you are too close you are expected to measure.

Maybe it's because Mr. Controversial Gesture, alias Sir The Nazis Were Actually Leftists aka Dr. Only The AfD Can Save Germany rivals only Ford in his open support of fasism? You know, Henry Ford, the guy Adolf Hitler called "a great man"?

In a bar, 13% of guests openly wear nazi clothes, with swastikas and German military emblems.

Is it a nazi bar?

You wouldn't have a notebook. Any and all stimuli would be banned as the purpose is making your experience horrible.

Also, you get incredibly mundane tasks as well. Maybe you'll get a couple sheets of random symbols and are tasked to count a certain letter. And if you don't do this task you can be laid off for underperforming.

Daran hab ich auch gedacht, dies ließe sich durch eine zentrale Speicherung der Schlüssel beheben. Im Falle des Verlusts der Karte bzw. bei Wechsel der Krankenkasse - und nur dann - darf der jeweilige Schlüssel von der Datenbank gelesen werden.

So etwas sicher zu gestalten ist nicht sonderlich schwer, da der Zugang ausschließlich einer einzigen Partei - der Krankenkasse - ermöglicht werden muss. Somit kann man sämtliche Hardware, Software und Mitarbeiter kontrollieren und sicher aufsetzen. Z.B. könnte man die Server in einem Intranet der jeweiligen Krankenkasse aufstellen und den Zugang lediglich bestimmten, direkt verbundenen PCs erlauben. Selbst die größten deutschen Krankenkassen hätten nur eine handvoll Zugriffe pro Tag auf die Server; dies lässt sich sehr leicht absichern und überwachen.

Ignoriert wurde es nicht, zudem der Prüfungsraum ca. 10 Meter von einem ebenerdigen Ausgang entfernt lag. Die Evakuation hätte höchstens eine Minute gedauert, das Risiko war also akzeptabel.

Auf einer Risikomatrix wären wir im gelben Bereich: Praktisch unmögliche Schadenswahrscheinlichkeit mit kritischem Schadensausmaß. Wäre der Prüfungsraum z.B. m dritten Stock, wäre die Schadenswahrscheinlichkeit durch die längere Evakuationsdauer höher und somit das Risiko, die Evakuation zu verzögern, inakzeptabel.

Aufpasser an Feueralarmknöpfen hätten in diesem Fall ja auch nichts gebracht.

Ich fand es relativ harmlos, da sehr schnell klar war, dass es sich um einen Fehlalarm hielte. Gäbe es Restunklarheit, auch nach wenigen Minuten, so hätte der Raum evakuiert werden müssen.

Bei uns gab es auch einen Feueralarm (ein 8.(?)-Klässler hat die Anweisung im Chemiunterricht völlig missachtet und eine Rauchwolke unter einem Rauchmelder verursacht). Meines Wissens hat die Prüfungsaufsicht davon nach wenigen Minuten mitbekommen (währenddessen weitergeschrieben wurde) und es wurden 15 Minuten Zusatzzeit - aka solange die Feuermeldedurchsage lief - gewährt.

Ich seh einige Probleme, vor allem da Sicherheit (Security) und Bedienbarkeit leider stark im Konflikt stehen.

Als relativer Laie würde ich als Design einen Hardware-Schlüssel in alle Krankenkarten packen, mit dem die jeweilige EPA verschlüsselt ist. Zugriff auf die verschlüsselte EPA erhalten Arztpraxen überhaupt erst durch das existierende Verifizierungsgedöns mit dem auch Abrechnungen gemacht werden.

Problem hierbei ist, dass ein Programmierer aber keine Hardware-Entscheidungen treffen kann. Wenn also die Grundbedingungen Schrott sind, kann man höchstens so viel Schaden begrenzen. Wenn also im Ausschreiben vom Bund drinsteht, dass haufenweise Akteure leicht massenhaft Zugriff haben sollen (privatwirtschaftliche Forschung und so) kannst du nicht viel machen.

Surely you must love VS Codium even more.

Fully agree. Just wanted to provide an argument why having commercial truck drivers have some English proficiency could be beneficial for safety. Requiring a 3 month English course for those unfamiliar with the language as part of getting a CDL would do the trick. But that wouldn't hand money to private prisons, would it?

But the inconsistency is the problem.

Take a look at the top signs about driving on the shoulder. Who is to say there aren't twenty more variations?

Maybe a couple of

"Driving on shoulder mandatory"

"Trucks on shoulder only"

"Passing on shoulder permitted"

"$100 fine for driving on shoulder"

"Keep shoulder clear"

"No trucks allowed on shoulder"

There doesn't seem to be any standard. It's just text.

Doesn't the US have a shitton of unstandardized road signs which are just words?

I feel like you have to have some English proficiency to understand them.

Isn't that how exams are always supposed to be done?

1/3 is testing knowledge alone, 1/3 is testing your ability to apply this knowledge to problems and 1/3 is testing your ability to transfer your knowledge to new contexts.

Example for maths:

Knowledge: Provide the formula to solve any quadratic equation.

Apply knowledge: Solve this quadratic equation: [...]

Transfer knowledge: [Some long text problem requiring you to translate it into mathematical terms and then solve it]