Skip Navigation
26 comments
  • Besides the war, under fascism hunger and disease are justified to "toughen up" the "volk" and weed out the "untermenschen". You can already see how RFK and the tariffs are setting the stage for both. Suffering will be seen as proof of your obedience, objection to the suffering will be considered disloyalty and punished.

  • Socially, war is a way to forcefully redistribute suffering and resources. This is a somewhat old (thousands of years) cultural tradition: instead of rationing and even sacrificing (yes, voluntary human sacrifice), the sacrifice and misery is turned into this team competition. In such civilizations, it's likely that rulers understood that they're "culling their populations" by going to war with other elites and having this "mutual sacrifice" going on. This is more evident with colonialism and capitalism, with war being a racket in the context of catabolic capitalism.

    The reason we say "NO WAR EXCEPT FOR CLASS WAR" is, well, class war is already happening and the other forms of war are used to maintain the class hierarchy.

    (Some) leftists do have a problem with tolerating class war violence, with making up excuses. I see it with those who make up excuses for the genocide of indigenous people by the hand of settlers, miners, ranchers and others who are trying to accumulate wealth in capitalism's rat race. So...

26 comments