wolfpack86 @ wolfpack86 @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

578

Joined

2 yr. ago

Let's see if he contests extradition

These lists are completely disingenuous. Just because something was the first use case doesn't mean it was the only use case for a thing.

For example. Freeze dried food. It's completely impossible to say we would not have freeze dried food without the space program.

The difference between Chris Wright at 171m and Elon at 300b is about 300b.

Hey, I'm outraged!

Outraged at the fact that the system is so fucking shitty someone felt the need to do this in retaliation.

Yes but you see Møllehøj is still higher than the pyramids. Sooooo.

/S

I'd like to see this on county level like voter maps.

Curious how cities and rural look compared to each other within a state, and how rural in low average states look across.

For example is LA just so skinny and populous it hides that rural California is as bad as rural Oklahoma?

Not here, anyway

PSA you can check a bitly link without clicking it by using their link checker: https://support.bitly.com/hc/en-us/p/link-checker

The joke is always better when someone explains it.

Europeans: haha you guys have no history!

Also Europeans: haha you're curious where your family emigrated from! Losers!

I'm sure they were mortified they needed to release a proprietary connector

I think what OP meant is that there's no new creation of types of devices.

My new phone is objectively and subjectively better than the previous two I've owned over the last 6 years, but it's doing the same tasks.

This is overly dramatic. It's not like you were on the same flight number, but the day before.

Yes, and you abolish FPTP and now you elect a president how? I'm interested in your proposal, because it's incomplete to say get rid of FPTP... Otherwise top vote getter, who gets maybe 30% of the vote leads the country which is also an abomination as 70% didn't vote for that person.

Abolishing FPTP requires doing something else on top of it, ranked choice or run off would be better than the highest count.

Okay so you go with what system?

Let's say the breakdown of votes looks the same as the Swedish breakdown. There will be more people that voted for a different candidate than the red one (Social Democrat).

This then requires a run off system like france, or a ranked choice, which is also fine to propose, but you can't hold up a visual of a parliament and say the system is so much better, when we talk about one singular office.

The post compared two things that have different end goals

This fixes congress. How does this fix the presidency, which is one single office?

All they need is 5 SCOTUS justices to agree the text means whatever.

Then you need a different SCOTUS session to disagree or all of that to fix the text

That's some Sov Cit level legal gymnastics.

"This undocumented immigrant is just travelling, we have no jurisdiction over them"

Figuratively infigurate

So say 100 people work at this company, the other 98 not involved don't want to listen to you rant and rave either. They might understand, but the more you escalate the less they want to deal with your shit either.