I’m looking for a better TTRPG experience. Started with AD&D in satanic panic era, left, came back to 5E a half dozen years ago. Got a great group & GM but some things just don’t suit me. For one, wouldn’t mind being done with Hasbro. My biggest issues in D&D? Character regret, & swinginess. Rolling up a character idea that sounds fun, but in-game always seems to go some completely different direction & now I’ve got an established character everyone depends on but locked into an un-fun stat / ability set. And ALWAYS whatever my concept is I can’t seem to roll for crap in those stats even with the bonuses, failing check after check when it’s the one thing I should be good at. That should only be possible rarely IMHO. Goals: I want above to go away or be much weaker. I want to be able to introduce friends & family who are new & unsure, probably rules light? But I do like dice rolling & some structure, don’t know if a pure storytelling game would work. Can’t be purely abstract. I love a good campaign but also a lot of times just want to be a beer league player, sit down, go to a cave & smash stuff, without needing a complex story to it. Party needs gold, rescue the missing turtle, let’s get swinging. Have thought for a long time about maybe west marches type scenarios. Show up, solve problems, check boxes, bring a new sheet to the next game whenever. Would work great for some of the gang. Not at all adverse to player death. Sorry so long, love to hear opinions!
TBH, no rules expert, but I don’t think it from a late out of bounds hit, but you can’t really ever get away with going head-to-head on a QB. No low tackles, stay away from their head, don’t take more than 2 steps, don’t body them to the ground, etc. I think that’s why it was Unsportsmanlike, but I could be wrong.
Considering the PI calls that weren’t made, I’m surprised they called any at all. Seems like it was all open play to the zebras. No talk at all about a couple series earlier when the Chiefs receiver was tackled before the ball was even thrown, ended the drive, Packers go on to score. Hard for me to say one no-call had more impact than the other.
For sure a valid question. My presumption is that the same drugs legally produced & sold under that country's regulations would have a reasonable factor of safety. Good enough for their own people anyway. I think also if I'm faced with the decision, no insulin because I can't afford it, or drugs only approved to Country X standards, I'm already in a risky situation. For sure some people are already doing this & having to do so illegally.
Dumb idea, I know nothing about this all. What about alternatively opening up across-the-border purchases, allowing people to legally buy from other countries at a fraction of current US prices. Drug companies can still set their US, uncontrolled prices at whatever they want, & no one has to buy it from them. It'd be like, a Free Market at work. I know this is oversimplified & there's a lot of complications I'm not aware of, but, just a thought. Also, speaking of unconstitutional, isn't group collusion to manipulate the market a violation of Sherman Anti-Trust law? Just saying.