This, but unironically.

Give shitty advice, get a shitty summary of your own shitty advice.

"If you're not sure, better take the safer bet and nonconsensually burden some newly created living beings with the thousand natural shocks that flesh is heir to."

Actually, you can disapprove of both hamas and the murder of tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians. Simultaneously. Without self-contradiction, even. Give it a try!

You mean like in cartoons, if one hit to the head with a frying pan makes you lose your memories, another hit will make them come back?

Does anyone else want to set the world on fire? Cause I don't. I just want to start a flame in your heart.

And there were also Jewish supporters of the literal nazi party. So what?

You are right, this video is clickbait mitigation, not clickbait itself. The haters are just primed to hate at the drop of a hat.

Thank heavens somebody understands the laws of thermodynamics.

OK. Thank you for your insights.

Those two actions would suffice?

And, hypothetically of course, what specific actions would the democrats need to perform to become a significantly better choice than the republicans, enough to earn your vote?

And that means you would 1) vote for Trump, 2) make a third party protest vote, or 3) not vote at all? Not criticizing any of those options, just trying to translate your sentiment into concrete actions.

Yep, they do have some areas of overlap. Do you think there's anything at all that one side does better than the other?

So they are both, as individuals, senile old men. Shit choice, but if you're going to vote at all, the vote you cast is ultimately for the administration that comes along with the individual. The old men are just the mascots.

This is why I'm playing the game in early access. Each update could be the one that lets you pet the dog! Very exciting.

Semantic stop signs, if you like.

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/FWMfQKG3RpZx6irjm/semantic-stopsigns

I guess you could say the same of regular conversion therapy advocates. Many could honestly say that they only want what's best for the other person. They just use their own definition of "best" and refuse to consider any alternatives.

It is correct that non-binary can fall under the trans umbrella. It is not correct that femboys are "in denial" about their gender. Nobody gets to decide that but them. This post is hopefully satire, but taken literally, it's advocating for reverse conversion therapy.

Romanes eunt domus. Et prescriptive grammarians can eunt the fuck domus, too.