Good thing nothing will happen until 2049
/s
Here’s the up to date version: https://climatereanalyzer.org/clim/sst_daily/
tl;dr: still hot
4 in 5 people want more action on climate, as long as:
- they need not change anything themselves
- someone else pays for it
- it’s not in their way
Remember, it’s only for six months
I agree with you on principle, but this chart is economics-based, like it or not. And many people do think like that.
My point here is for them: this chart is not realistic. For example, it almost equates lentils with chicken. Even though chicken involves a lot more costs, including in animal welfare, societal, etc.
Monetary cost is the wrong y-axis here, as it optimkzes only for mega-scale farming without taking its real costs in consideration. It should be ‘true cost’, which also accounts for environmental-, animal- and climate mitigation cost. And subsidies.
Monetary cost is the wrong y-axis here, as it optimkzes only for mega-scale farming without taking its real costs in consideration. It should be ‘true cost’, which also accounts for environmental-, animal- and climate mitigation cost.
Monetary cost is the wrong y-axis here, as it optimkzes only for mega-scale farming without taking its real costs in consideration. It should be ‘true cost’, which also accounts for environmental-, animal- and climate mitigation cost.
Monetary cost is the wrong y-axis here, as it optimizes only for mega-scale farming without taking its real costs in consideration. It should be ‘true cost’, which also accounts for environmental-, animal- and climate mitigation cost.
Yes now Europe will fight Germany’s crime /s
This is the kinda stuff I wanted to hear, thanks!
And for those in the US: pay congress!
Bring it on. I’m still deciding if I should risk it
“Dort wo man Bücher verbrennt, verbrennt man auch am Ende Menschen”
War aim #1: everybody’s forgotten about Netanyahus pending trials
Might take a while before the diaper stench dissipates