That's so wild. I met one person and I was just following them around to see where the "AI" was taking them. I thought it was very advanced for an older game 😅 I think I may not be the smartest

Wait that other person I saw was a real person and not an NPC?? 🤯

Dwarves are known for being pretty strong, aren't they?

Pretty sure it's mostly the one poster

'*' is commonly used for multiplication in computer programming, so it's probably that. Also in your calculator app

It also doesn't have an algorithm, which would make it difficult to find content you want when there are loads of creators

To you, yes, but to outside observers it would last a very, very long time 🙈

Several bisexual people I know call themselves gay. I also assumed bisexual was included. I think it's a more general term these days

The character is Infinite from Sonic Forces

It is literally stretch because the difference in gravity at your feet would be much stronger than the gravity at your head, pulling you apart

Oh, now that other post makes sense

I agree. However, to me, something feels wrong about companies making money selling a product to people with the promise that they work when they don't actually do anything in and of themselves. It's false advertising plus taking money out of people's pockets.

If it was "die instantly," then I would definitely press it. However, it says "die a gruesome death," which kinda scares me, so I'm not sure if I would...

it's pretty common to call twinks "half's"

That is a brilliant typo

I also thought that, but I have already saved the meme...

This is why I like the term "marginalised group." But maybe it has its own definition that I'm not using correctly or something

I think they're referring to video games. AAA games refer to games made by large companies with huge budgets: think Assassin's Creed, GTA, Call of Duty, etc.

They've been pumping out some trash games for the last while

It's not split in half, it's reversed, which is why both are equal to S. If you just took half, then 1 + 2 + ... would not equal 100 + 99 + ... and so they both wouldn't be equal to S.

Instead of halving the list, they just reversed it and summed it to 2S later, which they then half. So no typo here.

Oh my god it took me too long to realise this was an onion article hahahahaha

There are several ways it's presented. But anything other than four 8-hour days with the same salary is just trying to pander to the rich people to make it more appealing to them. I personally would feel pretty terrible having to work 10 hours a day, and it would negate the positives of having an extra day off. It'd work for some people but it wouldn't be a real win for the working class as it would be the same number of working hours even though productivity has skyrocketed in the previous decades