SorteKanin @ SorteKanin @feddit.dk Posts 76Comments 1,955Joined 2 yr. ago
Can they actually explode?
True is some of this, I've been cast iron my whole life.
I’ve seen some mods power tripping just like good old Reddit.
The difference is that when that happens on Reddit, you can't go anywhere else. On Lemmy, you can go to any other instance and do it better if you feel the mods elsewhere are bad.
I need to perform a magic trick to make my feed “better”. At least it’s not that addicting
Lemmy's feed is intentionally (or I think it is intentional at least) worse in this aspect than Reddit's feed, in order to not be as addictive. Take that how you will.
Maybe what I see as red is actually what I see as blue to someone else.
This is a very common interesting thought, but what I've started thinking is even more interesting is this related thought:
Why does red look like it does, to you? I'm not concerned with how other people see red here, I'm just thinking about a single person (me or yourself, for instance). Why does red look like that? Why not differently? Something inside your eyes or your brain must be deciding that.
You could say "oh it's because red is this and that wavelength" but what decides that exactly that wavelength looks like that (red)? There must be some physical process that at some point makes the qualia that is red - but how does it do that? The qualia that is red seems to be entirely arbitrary and decidedly not a physical thing. It is just a sensation, an experience, a qualia. But your eyes/brain somehow decides that ~650 nm wavelength translates to exactly that qualia. What decides that and how?
So what you meant to say is that you don't see a difference above 60 Hz. But other people definitely can tell the difference. Don't generalize on everyone based on your own experiences.
Do you think that the conversation around, e.g, python programming or wood turning techniques will vary so much that it warrants many specific flavors?
I don't see why not. Human culture is like a fractal after all :P. At least I don't think we should discourage creating different places for the same topics, because different approaches is part of decentralization.
for the cases where the culture is more-or-less universal
When is this ever true? The idea of a "universal culture" is exactly what I mean with this encouraging centralization. Even a specific community (subreddit) on a centralized service like Reddit will have a specific culture that is not in line with any "universal culture" (it's likely to be skewed towards whatever culture exists in western english-speaking countries, just to mention an example).
I personally am not a huge fan of this idea. Instances are at the end of the day communities of their own in a way. One community may want to discuss a topic in one way and another community may want to discuss it in another way. This seems to be a way to centralize all discussion around a topic in one community, but we should rather go for decentralized communities.
But hey that's just my opinion, if others like it, go for it.
They have a page on "supporting long form text in the fediverse" - but this is already supported? I think it's only Mastodon and other microblogging places that put restrictions on how long posts can be.
Hyperion Cantos. All 4 books are great, even if the 3rd and 4th are quite different. But it's a masterpiece. It's kind of like the LOTR for sci-fi if you ask me.
not everyone’s cup of tea
What? These books are very popular and well-liked. What is this qualification trying to say?
Zoxide, dust, fd, rg, btm, tokei. So many newer Rust tools that are way better than the old stuff.
Interstellar is the first one that comes to mind.
Congratulations Greece and Cyprus!
Russia is like an insecure teenager. "Everyone needs to know me and Greece/Cyprus aren't friends any more 😤".
But how do you know that the human brain is not just a super sophisticated next-thing predictor that by being super sophisticated manages to incorporate nuance and all that stuff to actually be intelligent? Not saying it is but still.
Them socks though
Sometimes the bandwagon goes down the wrong trail and it's hard to get back. Don't worry, happens to everyone sometimes. Just be glad it's just random internet strangers and meaningless internet points :)
Right, I see how you could read it like that but I read it more as a response to the intolerant people I mentioned and not really a comment on who did the murder in this case. Text-only communication is hard and often ambiguous like this but I like to at least give people the benefit of the doubt.
I'm not sure why they were downvoted so much - the way I read it, they mean that most of these super intolerant people are actually closeted LGBTQ+ people that are ashamed of themselves. E.g. the at this point almost common story of an anti-LGBT politician seen at a gay orgy or whatever. Or did I misunderstand what they meant?
It's just extra hypocritical in that sense.