Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SS
Posts
0
Comments
51
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I disagree with you last point.

    If it wasn't the default, people with poor vision would most likely wouldn't even know how to activate it by themselves.

    Most regular users, especially older ones that are more prone to these conditions, aren't technically savvy enough to rummage through app settings to learn how to toggle accessibility features.

    They'd just try to put on reading glasses and then struggle to use the app as it is.

    I think it makes more sense to have sensible defaults like that be activated and make it opt-out for those that don't like it

  • The good thing about open source is that anyone can contribute.

    Yeah, you won't make any money out of it, but if your goal isn't to make money, then you can team up with others to create your own Android dialer from scratch and that will be adopted.

    There's no vendor lockins possible

  • Not to burst your bubble but SMS is even less secure than WhatsApp. In fact, SMS is among the least secure communication avenues on a phone, since your telecommunications provider has the ability to keep logs of what you send, when you send it and to whom you send it to.

    Not to mention how insecure 4G is and how easy it is to intercept other people's messages

  • Also for streaming.

    Streaming on a phone (even a 6.6 inch phone) is annoying.

    The screen is too small for comfort and it's very difficult to make out small details which are important that are shown literally onscreen

  • I'm not arguing that. You're the one who's disingenuous, though, since you've been arguing the reverse all along.

    It's not that child molesters are more likely to consume CP, it's that you're saying that people that consume CP are more likely to be child molesters. That's what you've been arguing for all along, and now suddenly you switched to arguing the reverse now, when you're losing the argument.

    If these two statements are the same to you, then I would suggest not bothering with using heuristics. You're clearly not good at understanding scientific data