I also hope that they’ll be able to grow their catalogue, but I must point out that I don’t find it to be poor - I just wish it was even bigger.
They also have other areas where I hope they improve, like catalogue organisation and even better discovery (or Discover tab), but over all I like them very much and I have faith they’ll become even better (with a bigger user base).
They also have their own standout features. I.e I’ve always wanted playlist search that searches artist AND song title AND album - Qobuz has that.
The article seems focused on the digital angle, but I’m not sure.
Because it's sometimes easy to reproduce someone's else voice especially if you are a voice actor.
Is that widespread? My impression is that misrepresentation through fake likeness has exploded from AI generated deepfakes?
And what if you happen to have a voice almost identical to another person?
Then you have the right to your voice and they have the right to their voice. If neither uses the likeness for misrepresentation or other nefarious means then nothing will come of it. If either do there are probably already possibilities within current legal frameworks to prosecute.
It is hygge to read about Denmark doing good work in this area.
The proposal establishes legal definitions for unauthorized digital reproductions, specifically targeting “very realistic digital representation of a person, including their appearance and voice.”
Creative works such as parody and satirical content remain exempt from these restrictions.
I haven’t gotten around to using this feature yet, but I think it’s awesome that it exists.