I didn't know about otter, I was just starting to look for more since I miss the days of uzbl and all its inspirations. As far as I can tell, qute is the only one that survived
FYI, the new midori looks like a shameless clone of floorp. The only differences I can find are the default bookmarks and that floorp updates faster.
If anything, I would guess probably reddit since it kind of evolved from the early forums where it came from. Twitter has (had?) a much larger userbase though, so that's not a bad guess either. 🤷♂️
Where the hell did you get HTML from? /s is a tag literally made to denote that a given text is sarcastic. It's one of the few good things to come out of Twitter?
...that is much older than Twitter:
This symbol is an abbreviated version of the earlier /sarcasm, itself a simplification of <\sarcasm>, the form of a humorous XML closing tag marking the end of a "sarcasm" block.
It's so much more obvious to make a statement sound insane or to use /s.
Also, would most of the world even interpret that emoji as "eye rolling?"
You only interpret '\s' as sarcasm because of html and sarcasm beginning with the letter 's'. If you don't think pictorial eye-rolling 'looks' like sarcasm, just consider it almost like hieroglyphs.
There is no monopoly in video streaming. Not even close.
Ah, you're one of those people. Okay.
Public services aren't efficient, but they can surely change themselves more efficiently than they can force a multi billion dollar company to change its ways.
[citation needed]
I'm surprised you're not more worried about the government outsourcing its functions to a company you seem very suspicious of.
You're the one talking about all the alternate video services you use. I just dont want a monopoly.
If the government decided to have vital public meetings only in a private venue you have to be a member of or something, the proper fix is not to force the club to accept everyone, it's to have the government stop having vital meetings in private places.
wut. Not having meetings in private places literally is making sure the 'place' accepts everyone. Do you even read what you're saying?
I also don't see a problem because everything of value these video streaming services offer is replaceable by one of the many other streaming services. The fact that YouTube is the biggest or most recognized does not change anything for me. The fact that there is some content that is only on YouTube doesn't, either.
Well, you totally missed the point then.
The efficient solution to that problem is governments using a different platform that's actually neutral.
First time I've heard public services called efficient, but ok.
I'm not being disingenuous. I watch videos on a bunch of platforms. It's easy.
We're not talking about you here. You're purposely ignoring the problem, and therefore being disingenuous.
There are countless other video streaming services.
There are government websites - including my state's dmv - that exclusively use youtube. You're being disingenuous when you're saying you can just use another streaming service (and I don't believe you don't know it).
Is it more anti competitive than McDonald's only selling McDonald's burgers
Yeah, it's more like the next time you go to Wendy's, McDonald's will follow you and try to lock the doors before you go in.
Whereas Android phones tend to have sharper corners, for whatever reason.
Because Apple has design patents on those corners. Samsung lost a lawsuit about it and almost had to pay out a billion dollars.
Only because he'll get a ticket if he's caught not wearing his seatbelt.
How is ESO outsourced? It's made by a studio within Zenimax that was basically created just for that game.
*it is I, THE IGNORANT ONE!
Heard it the same exact way when I was reading it.
Wow, it's like you ignored everything I just said
Yup, seek help.
You should have deleted your comment.
It literally said "ignore this."
Seek help.
Dude, i wasn't even trying to talk to you. I thought I was talking to the other guy, which is why I left that there. Calm down.
I just realized you're not the same person, but your response is still weird given the context of the conversation.
Original below, but ignore it I guess.
Because at some point people have to figure out their own shit for themselves.
Uh...The question was "why is the US so involved with Israel," and you replied it's because the US is against genocide. So then, 'shouldn't Israel be figuring its shit out' without us?
We usually get involved when things get extreme, or when someone's trying to keep us from the oil (just keeping it real).
Agreed, but I'm not the one picking favorites here.
There were/are many genocides over the past 70 years for which the US had/has the chance to intervene. If this was really our goal, why haven't/don't we step in for them?