Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)PO
Posts
1
Comments
154
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Yes completely agree. Especially the price, most people don't want to pay or can't afford a 45-50k usd car after subsidies. (This is the minimum pricepoint to get something comparable to an average gas car, both trim wise and to get an at least acceptable range)

    And let's be honest about the subsidies, they just allow the car companies to charge a higher price in the first place.. I expect the price to be about the same after they are gone.

  • Zartprickelnd

    Jump
  • It's funny how my mind tells me her proportions look completely cartoonish and ridiculous. But my penis tells me it's the best thing ever.

    Btw for other people following their penises advice: Leicht Perlig

  • Fact

    Jump
  • Taylor Swift is a business.Yes, in the future it could be higher. It depends on where the company is going. Artists get less popular over time and alot of assets would then necessitate scaling down, and be offloaded. If the person Taylor Swift decides she does not want to be associated with the business anymore it could lose alot, if she died probably the opposite would be true for a while. Yes a considerable amount of revenue would probably be coming in for the foreseeable future.

    Tldr: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. A billion dollar company is already an amazing feat and it is impressive if Taylor can keep the ball rolling at that scale.

  • Fact

    Jump
  • Yes, I understand how it seems like I refered to the person and not the artist.

    I still don't understand how you come to the conclusion that the net worth should be at least double? Based on what? My point is that it is extremely impressive to have a billion dollar company as is, in only a decade

  • Fact

    Jump
  • That has probably only ever helped her gain more. There is a good reason why rich people like to start charities and give money. It's for publicity and as a tax write-off.

    USA is the perfect country for getting rich and staying rich and getting richer. She could never have that kind of networth in any other country in the world as a pop act.

  • Yes, and often incomplete or not maintained.

    Anyway, OP read different sources about OOP and still needs to ask the definition... At some point it is better to just do something than to keep banging your head at the theory. If learning to code is your endgoal

  • You are right. But I still find the 'heavier' theory, that is what I assumed OP refered to, to be more difficult to grasp then following a basic tutorial and just trying to solve problems. In time with practice you get a better understanding for WHY the theory is how it is, and you can apply it better and of course improve your code. And that understanding will unlock more tools both in OOP and in your mind.

    So if you are struggling, I recommend not starting with theory.

  • Maybe some "older" models. Hyundai Kona 2019 comes to mind. Being connected is sold as a feature, most often paired with an app, and is something alot of customers ask for. It has added convenience at the expense of sharing all your data.

    I agree with you that it sucks, but also for the reason that I will have a 2 ton brick on my driveway if the manufacturer decide to not support the model anymore. Or best case the cars just loose alot of features and value that I paid alot of money for when I bought the car. There is a possible future that the vehicles produced today will be even worse for the environment because they will basically have build-in planned obsolescence.

  • Musk is an idiot. Buying a car meeting your needs does not make you an idiot, it is a reasonable car in many ways. Albeit basic and in many many ways falsely advertising. The only idiotic thing is defending a flawed product sold on the promises in the false advertising, this is in the very least unethical and in many cases illegal for a company to do in many markets.

    Tesla owners would have a better car today if they would hold the company accountable for the things that does not work as intended or otherwise flawed. As consumers we should stick together and not defend companies bullshit, it hurts us all in the end.

    If you are the owner of any consumer product and defends or explain away obvious flaws and don't care about false advertising, then you are a fucking idiot.

  • Thanks for your answer, interesting read 👍

    That does seem wasteful of course. But I also wonder what will happen to the EV batteries in the end, and what will happen with cars that are too dependent on software, will the cars be unusable when the manufacturer does not want to support them anymore. All products get old and "worse" over time, but with EVs that seem to happen alot quicker just because of battery and software. Will there be brand new cars, 10 years from now being bricked because because the app is not supported anymore or the battery is not holding a practical amount of charge.

    I find EVs outside of metropolitan areas in Sweden being very unpractical too. Not because there are no charging infrastructure, but I find it very unreliable. I never know what I am going to get when I stop at a station, are there any unused chargers, how much power delivery, is it working at all, what kind of app etc etc. Keep in mind i drove around the holidays where, of course, alot of other people also drove, so my experience is not the most positive in that sense. It works better for everyday commuting, because of the simple fact that you can mostly charge where at home.

  • Very noble of you but most environmental issues with cars are not related to what kind of fuel they are propelled forward by. Rental cars are arguably a better option for the environment, because it is one vehicle used by many, regardless of fuel type.