Yeah I would say that one could explain the picture here
Ultimately, the phenomenon is happening much much higher up in the atmosphere, so being a few kilometers closer vertically won't make a difference; but by being further up on the ground, you could see an aurora from further away and through a lot more molecules that could scatter non-red light
That's a cool photo, thanks for sharing.
For more context why this wouldn't be related to redshift, redshift is a concept in physics for light that's analogous to the Doppler shift for sound. The typical example of Doppler shift is the EEEEE-OO-UUUUUM sound a car makes when moving fast past you. When the car is speeding away from you, the sound pitch is noticeably lower
Similarly, when a light emitter moves away from you at extremely fast speeds (i.e. hundreds of millions of meters or yards per second), the light you see reaching you will be shifted down in frequency, towards red in visible light. This can happen in other more complicated relativistic situations too but they are less easy to explain and also not applicable here
I don't know why the people in the photo see this beautiful red aurora but redshift is almost certainly not a related concept here
The answer is almost certainly no but I'm curious why you think this might be the case
Honestly, I would recommend the audiobook over the book; having someone else figure out how to say the special names makes it much easier to keep track of them in your mind, I find
Okay now try "game" again but way happier and with your mouth way open https://piped.video/watch?v=ABxH-NTF0SM
Picking a higher density of the material just means the one gram would occupy less volume, it doesn't affect how much energy that gram is equivalent to in terms of E=mc2. For that calculation, as the equation implies, only the mass matters; a gram of feathers is equivalent to the same amount of energy as a gram of lead for that equation. Now, this equation is in fact a simplified assumption; if you launch your feather at relativistic speed, then we're talking
It doesn't fit all the criteria you mentioned, but if you don't print that much and wanna try a dryer before buying anything, you can make a cardboard foil tent for your printer bed and use that https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MflrcqNozqs
Oh I see; I knew they stopped supporting it after a while but I thought the official app was a descendent of that codebase
The comparison is even more apt when you remember that the official Reddit app also used to be the most popular and great 3rd-party app called AlienBlue, which was purchased from 1 guy and rebranded a decade ago.
It's pretty clear that the reason why the official Reddit app isn't good is because a good experience for their users isn't their goal.
In Canada, they typically pick one or two last names out of four for the kid. Some adults decide to go by just one of their last names too
I had a blunt umbrella several years ago (not the compact model however) and it was great quality and would buy it again. I sadly lost mine a while back
Centicentigrade
-- says the head
There's a channel called Improbable Matter on YouTube created by a scientist formerly working on fusion with a super interesting series about fusion power https://www.youtube.com/@ImprobableMatter
I agree with you; I think it is indeed the absolute bare minimum they had to do but I also agree with xc2215x that it's a good move. They moved from -100 to -99 on my shithead-o-meter scale
I mean, Substack lit all the benefit of the doubt I had for them on fire with their previous response.
This new action doesn't restore that, but all things being equal, I do want nazi shitheads to be de-platformed and have their funding cut off.
I think one can both acknowledge that they finally did a move in the correct direction and still think that they suck overall
'No Way To Prevent This,' Says Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens
(... from almost 10 years ago now jesus)
I like how it has really vague boundaries that are obviously approximate but then it pretends to do precise gerrymandering-type carveouts in the second map